WTF. I wouldn’t even know where to start without studying the layout ahead of time.Obligatory Swindon Magic Roundabout reference:
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
WTF. I wouldn’t even know where to start without studying the layout ahead of time.Obligatory Swindon Magic Roundabout reference:
Looks like the Model 3 MCU/AP computer in about the same place as the in S & X
Obligatory Swindon Magic Roundabout reference:
Also redundant steering motors.I'm surprised no one has posted in this thread since today's autonomous presentation. Did anyone catch the comment about redundant power supply for the FSD computer? I wonder if HW2.0 or 2.5 cars will have that capability when upgraded to HW3..
I'm surprised no one has posted in this thread since today's autonomous presentation. Did anyone catch the comment about redundant power supply for the FSD computer? I wonder if HW2.0 or 2.5 cars will have that capability when upgraded to HW3..
If the power supply is on board the FSD unit, yes, if the redundant power supply is off the FSD board it's a valid question.The entire module/ unit gets swapped. So yes, the full HW3 system shown.
If the power supply is on board the FSD unit, yes, if the redundant power supply is off the FSD board it's a valid question.
Maybe just a small battery to keep it powered just enough to stop the car safely?Yes, I’m asking because I do think the power is off-board. I don’t see how it could be onboard in such a small package, especially two of them.
The power supply is on board. The revelent portion of the PCB was highlighted during the talk. One supply is near the top left, the other near the bottom left.If the power supply is on board the FSD unit, yes, if the redundant power supply is off the FSD board it's a valid question.
The entire board only uses 75 watts, a 50 watt buck converter is trivial to design in minimal space. www.ti.com has a tool that will give you multiple options for such a thing.Yes, I’m asking because I do think the power is off-board. I don’t see how it could be onboard in such a small package, especially two of them.
Just report the post and tell the moderators what you are requesting they do for you. If you do that infrequently enough, you'll find most moderators are often polite enough to do so for you. In this way, if you continue to force yourself to post correctly in the first place (proofread slowly many times -- this takes time), you will minimize your need to have moderators correct your mistakes to a level that they can probably handle. I used to think the time to proofread would take away from my ability to communicate effectively due to the high cost of proofreading. I've found that the expediency of not proofreading is not worth it if it gets close to the edit time limit. If I get close to the expiry of the edit time period (15 minutes away), I just delete the message and put it in a local editor and proofread for a few more hours then post. For important or long posts, it's not even worth posting in the first place until fully proofread. You could even make an off-site repository of a draft and post a link to the draft on TMC, saying you'll post the final version on TMC once you're done.Duh, of course there needed to be a typo in title that I totally missed and cannot edit apparently?
Of course, the power source (12v battery) is off board with redundant feeds to the two on board converters.
That's what I'm asking about. Do all Tesla models built from Oct 2016 to March 2019 include a redundant power source feed, or does that redundancy need to be added at the time of the FSD computer retrofit to satisfy the "fully-redundant system" requirements?
I think the kangaroo issue it that don't touch the ground when moving. So any system that relies on visible pavement or vertical positioning for depth estimation will think a mid air roo is further away than it really is.
Yah, however if the roo is moving across the road (tangential to the car's motion), it will not show up well due to being at the the same speed relative to the car as the stationary objects. (Stopped vehicle problem)radar will know the distance of the roo, doesn't matter if it's airborne or not so long as it's in the forward arc of the radar.
Yah, however if the roo is moving across the road (tangential to the car's motion), it will not show up well due to being at the the same speed relative to the car as the stationary objects. (Stopped vehicle problem)
...and proofread for a few more hours then post...