Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Tesla BEV Competition Developments

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
"TOKYO -- Japanese automaker Subaru is set to withdraw from production and sales of diesel cars, which the company currently sells in Europe and Australia, by the fiscal year 2020, sources said.

The company will focus its shift to electric vehicles amid a global trend of environmental regulation.

Subaru believes it would be difficult to develop a new diesel engine that would meet European standards."

Subaru to withdraw from diesel cars by fiscal 2020- Nikkei Asian Review
 
Car manufacturers usually don't show cars at that production stage. They don't plaster camouflage film over the car for fun.

That depends entirely on the situation. Typically car makers have to protect their ongoing sales while they develop new models. If a new model gets known too early, it may osborne their current sales.

So for Audi for not showing their car may have two reasons:
1) They don't have much to show.
2) They are afraid that nobody would buy the existing Q Series once they realize what the Q6 can do.

Call me cynic but history seems to indicate we are dealing more with 1) than with 2)...

The biggest issue for Audi would be if the Q6 looks great, but they can't sell many since they don't have the batteries/the charging infrastructure and then people move over to the Model X... Anyways, I don't believe that Audi is serious at all. And I hope I'm wrong. And I look forward to the day I'm proven wrong but if you look today, all you see is more concepts and announcements and nothing that is even close to production.
 
So for Audi for not showing their car may have two reasons:
1) They don't have much to show.
2) They are afraid that nobody would buy the existing Q Series once they realize what the Q6 can do.
3) They need to camouflage their test cars to make sure that onlookers understand that they are seeing an unknown/unshown new car. It's like having a big poster: "Hey! Paparazzi's! This way! Take your spy-photos!" ;)
 
So for Audi for not showing their car may have two reasons:
1) They don't have much to show.
2) They are afraid that nobody would buy the existing Q Series once they realize what the Q6 can do.

Call me cynic but history seems to indicate we are dealing more with 1) than with 2)...

Yeah. No on that. Audi Brussels is 100% sure gearing up for the e-Tron which includes hiring. You don't hire over 500 additional employees in a strict union controlled landscape like Belgian automotive manufacturing if you are not going to put them to use. Union would have screamed bloody murder in Belgian media if that were the case.
 
"Daimler to invest $1 billion in Alabama plant
By Chester Dawson
Published: Sept 21, 2017 5:26 a.m. ET


TUSCALOOSA, Ala.-- Daimler AG plans to invest $1 billion in its Alabama manufacturing operations and start production of a fully electric sport-utility vehicle, a move that comes as the German auto maker expands its U.S. footprint and global electrification drive.

The company will begin production of an electric SUV early next decade at its Tuscaloosa plant and begin construction next year of a nearby facility to assemble battery systems for use in those and other vehicles, according to people familiar with its plans. Combined, the new plans are expected to add as many as 600 new jobs, these people said.

The new SUV will be sold under the Mercedes-Benz EQ subbrand, according to the people with knowledge of the plans.

Daimler's expansion in the U.S. is part of a global push into electric vehicles and follows its announcement in July to build a similar battery assembly facility in China. The company plans to offer more than 50 fully or partly electric vehicles, and by 2022 electrify its entire Mercedes brand lineup.

The investment comes on top of the $5.8 billion Daimler already has invested on its Tuscaloosa operations, which began production in 1997. Last year, the plant produced more than 310,000 Mercedes vehicles, including mid- and large-size SUVs as well as entry-level C-Class sedans."

Daimler to invest $1 billion in Alabama plant
 
"Daimler to invest $1 billion in Alabama plant
By Chester Dawson
Published: Sept 21, 2017 5:26 a.m. ET


The new SUV will be sold under the Mercedes-Benz EQ subbrand, according to the people with knowledge of the plans.

Why are EVs launched under their own sub-brands? Why do b***rds have the last name snow in GoT? So ashamed of their EV's that they can't share the family name.
 
Why are EVs launched under their own sub-brands? Why do b***rds have the last name snow in GoT? So ashamed of their EV's that they can't share the family name.

In fairness, one of the main things we've learned from Nissan and GM EV launches is that car dealers don't generally understand EVs or handle them well.

From never charging the Volts they offer for test drives to trying to talk customers out of the EV they came to buy and scheduling free oil changes for Leafs, most dealers handle EVs poorly (a few handle them much better, and become volume sellers fairly quickly.)

By separating the EVs into a new brand, maybe they can get a better level of training and a more encouraging corporate culture out to the dealers?

On the more cynical side, calling it a sub brand makes it seem like they are doing more than issuing press releases based on a concept car, more effectively than just announcing a future production would I think.
 
  • Like
Reactions: neroden
Why are EVs launched under their own sub-brands? Why do b***rds have the last name snow in GoT? So ashamed of their EV's that they can't share the family name.

Traditional car makers are in a difficult situation with EVs. They can't afford to have demand switch to EVs. It would crash sales for their ICE cars and the world can't produce enough batteries to switch to EVs. For anyone with any awareness of the prevailing winds, the future is EVs. Even executives in most major car companies see this.

The problem is surfing the transition from the old tech to the new. A lot of companies failed to make major paradigm shifts. Kodak is often cited as an example of this and it is true, but my father had a direct dealership with Kodak and consulted with them off and on. He said most of the people involved in R&D and management at Kodak knew they needed to make the transition to digital but ultimately there was no way for them to make money doing digital. With film, there is a huge supply chain to supply film, chemistry for processing, and photographic paper. Kodak was the biggest company in the world providing all these things. With digital, most customers buy one or two pieces of media and might buy some occasional printer paper to make hard copies, but the amount of supplies each customer needs is vastly smaller than for film.

The transition from ICE to EVs face a similar problem. EVs don't complex motors, transmissions, gasoline, vastly smaller amounts of lubricant, and once the bugs are fully worked out, they will be significantly more reliable. That is a massive problem for both car makers who have a tremendous amount of money invested in R&D and for their primary customer who are car dealers. Car dealers don't want to sell EVs because they don't stand to make as much from service.

An added headache for planners in car companies is the world battery supply. This wasn't an issue with the transition from film to digital, but it is an issue with EVs. EVs require a massive supply of something that is in short supply and requires a massive increase before the transition can fully happen. Car makers need to control demand for EVs until the battery supply ramps up.

So car makers have a lot of reasons to put EVs in a ghetto for now. They know they need to change and they are doing what they can to lay the groundwork, but whether all of them will make it is still an open question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SwTslaGrl
Dyson plans to launch electric car in 2020
Hero_Upright_Dyson_Cinetic_Big_Ball_USA.ashx



Dyson has unveiled plans to develop and build its own electric car by 2020, gatecrashing the existing market and promising to hire hundreds of people in the UK.

Sir James Dyson confirmed the long-rumoured plans, promising to invest £2bn of the company’s money to build a “radical” motor from scratch over the next few years.

Dyson has two competing teams working on “solid state” batteries, which are seen as safer and denser than existing lithium-ion batteries.

The company currently has a team of 400 staff working on the vehicle, but Sir James said the company’s 4,000 staff in the UK could eventually “double” due to the project.

He said the first vehicle would be at the pricey, “high-tech” end of the market, but that there would eventually be a range of vehicles.
 
...all you see is more concepts and announcements and nothing that is even close to production.

2018 is so far away (that's when Audi's EV will ship). Or isn't it? Do you think the plant in Belgium is just for show? A second car is already underway for 2019...

Audi e-tron Sportback to join e-tron SUV at Belgian plant

A third one will follow by 2020.

And in your opinion is the enrtire VW about to spend $80+ billion on "nothing"?

VW announces massive $84 billion investment in electric cars and batteries

PS: Linking to Tesla's favorite propaganda news outlet on purpose.