The answer for that is PHEVs. Better to use each 80 kWh to make 4 PHEV-50s that each drive 9-10k miles/year on electricity than a single long range BEV that drives 12-13k. Getting 3x as many electric miles from each 80 kWh "greatly accelerates the transition". Not a popular message here, of course.
The problem is that a PHEV solution depends on all the owners to behave well and plug in and limit themselves to electric range whenever possible and all that. Doesn’t seem to be the case in practice from what we know, other than small groups of enthusiasts.
A BEV solution only requires the manufacturers to behave well. The owners have no choice but to drive electric. Much easier to assure.
So yes, I’d rather have the actual 12-13k miles than the theoretical 3x that doesn’t come to fruition while also prolonging the ICE age.