martinicus
Member
Praying that the cost of the X60D upgrade comes down from 9,500 (before tax). That is insanity.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I also have a 75 and feel it is the best range for me and doesn't make me suffer too much anxiety on longer runs. I have a 260 mile roundtrip weekly and also can make it there and only need one stop on the way back, or on the way there and no stopping for the home leg.
I also built in tiredness, laziness, wishing to go home quicker and the 75 fitted my needs just right, plus the 75 I got was on a good deal inventory so made even more sense.
No regrets on a 75 here, and thats reading all the arguments for the 60.
It is established that charging to 100%is not harmful if you drive it righr after charging. See the thread on the battery that was charged to 100% twice a day for 200,000 mi.. as for 60 vs 75 or 90, 90 is one third more than a S 60. For me the 75 was worth it, but 90 is too rich as you have to take stuff I don't want like dual motors. In my case, I determined that the extra 40 miles was worth it as it allows a trip a 60 can't make without diverting for a splash charge. Visitors on a short trip get upset when something takes a couple of hours out of their time that they don't understand. Come visit and I'll show you.
charging over 86% regularly, and ...harming your own battery.
Indeed.Try to be objective.
Tesla has never given exact data on 100%charging. I believe this is partly because it might be taken by some as some sort of guarantee and partly because they really don't know as may be highly specific to each battery. This has been discussed several times in threads. Personally, i follow the thought that you charge to 90% as normal over nite and then charge to100% starting about 2hours before you leave. No one has reportes sitting at 100% for 2-3 hours has caused them degredation. In fact, there is one owner who reportedly has been trying to kill his battery in an arguement and been unsuccessful. In my case, finishing a100% charge to rated miles often leaves me with regeneration still working. 100% may not be really 100% for some cars.Need some clarification on what you’re saying. Not harmful to charge to 100% as long as you drive right away after charging - “Right away” meaning, after unplugging from the charger, or very, very soon after your indicator reads that you’ve reached 100%?
Thanks.
Tesla has never given exact data on 100%charging. I believe this is partly because it might be taken by some as some sort of guarantee and partly because they really don't know as may be highly specific to each battery. This has been discussed several times in threads. Personally, i follow the thought that you charge to 90% as normal over nite and then charge to100% starting about 2hours before you leave. No one has reportes sitting at 100% for 2-3 hours has caused them degredation. In fact, there is one owner who reportedly has been trying to kill his battery in an arguement and been unsuccessful. In my case, finishing a100% charge to rated miles often leaves me with regeneration still working. 100% may not be really 100% for some cars.
Charging a "60" to 100% is basically like charging a 75 to 86%... that's only 4% off of the 90% most people will charge to anyway. Seriously, charge your software limited 60's to 100% all the time and you're not hurting anything.
Yes. It was proven in post 1 of this thread. Charging a software locked 60 to 100% equates to 86% of the underlying battery.So has the argument of whether the 60 is top or bottom-limited been resolved? Because, as I understand it, that would make or break the case for charging it to 100% all the time.
I'm done. I'm changing my TMC password to the unknown output of cat /dev/urandom | base64 | cut -b1-32 | head -1 and logging out. I seriously can't deal with this forum anymore. I tried, hoped for an intelligent conversation on the topic, and this is what happens: a thread with 70 replies in just a few hours with no substance whatsoever and basically nothing even remotely on topic.
Looks like someone forgot to his happy pill this morning.
I mean Apple sells a 64gb phone, but when you turn it on for the first time it is more like 59Gb
WK just does not tolerate fools well (not that I'm calling anyone a fool)....Looks like someone forgot to his happy pill this morning.
WK just does not tolerate fools well (not that I'm calling anyone a fool)....
Trait I find fairly common in very skilled people, engineers especially (some whom may lack in social graces as well). They have a low tolerance for people beneath their skill level.
There are other things the meter does not show like climate usage, 12V battery charging, vampire drain, etc. moreover your energy meter might not be calibrated so when you fully charged to 100% it might be a bit less than the full usable 62.5Kwh. so unless the conditions are perfect you will not be able to see the full 62.5KWh.This is a great thread. It's very interesting to see that the usable capacity in a new 60 pack is 62.5kWh
Using trip meters in my X60D does not seem to jive with that. I charge to 100%(200 miles):
When I have 150 miles remaining range(75% battery remaining), the trip meter tells me that I've used 14.1kWh.
When I have 100 miles remaining range(50% battery remaining), the trip meter tells me that I've used 28.2kWh.
Extrapolating, that seems to mean that when I hit 0 miles remaining range(0% battery remaining), I will have used 56.4kWh. That doesn't jive with the 62.5kWh number. I definitely don't think wk057 is wrong, just trying to figure out where the disconnect may between what the trip meter says that I've used vs. what the battery is capable of.
There are other things the meter does not show like climate usage, 12V battery charging, vampire drain, etc. .
I think the meter just look at how much you used to go a certain miles. It cpuls be that the climate is included but I know others are not included.Whaaat? All of those things seem to be included in the meter, I think. When using heavy heat or A/C the Wh/mi number goes up quite a bit, which to me indicates that energy usage towards climate is indeed being counted by the trip meter.