MODERATOR: ~~~And with that, we'd better zip it. All done!~~~
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
About the part of "brand loyalty is a bit fickle", basically it says whoever bought an EV that's not a Tesla regrets deeply and will most likely "consider" Tesla next time.
Couldn't find the exact numbers but got some snippets from here:
I think the "900 points" bar is a typo though, since there is no car ranked above 800, Tesla models took all top ranks in premium segment with:
(even considering none-premium, only Kia Niro with 782 is close, others are all well below 750)
- Model S: 798
- Model 3: 790
- Model Y: 780
- Model X: 758
So to summarize the report:
Tesla owners satisfied, other EV owners regret, but none will go back to ICE.
The U-curve was forecast by Tony Seba. He is well aware of the battery cost decline curve.
Translation: The U-curve already includes the effect of cheaper batteries in the future.
The study finds that 95% of EV owners whose overall ownership satisfaction exceeds 900 points say they will purchase another EV. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of these owners say they “definitely will” repurchase the same brand.
So, where are all the posters that have called JD Power reports unscientific bovine feces in the past?
They are too busy calling Munro unscientific bovine feces...well depending on the video..So, where are all the posters that have called JD Power reports unscientific bovine feces in the past?
After watching the drone footages over the last few days I can’t help wondering how much more efficient Fremont would be if it were a Gigafactory instead of a lot of buildings cobbled together with lots of empty space between them. Too many people hanging/loitering around, a lot of storage in the open air, transport with forklifts and carriages, lines of cars waiting with drivers standing around.
The good thing: the more Gigafactories get built, the less Fremont will weigh on the average efficiency. And hopefully the high volume production (Model Y and 3) will eventually fully move to Gigafactories, leaving Fremont for lower volume products.
They are bad at making conclusions, good things for this report is, this is customer satisfaction survey, and it’s hard to tailor the survey to be biased to certain groups.So, where are all the posters that have called JD Power reports unscientific bovine feces in the past?
I'm seeing down 0.19% AH, so not crying wolf just yet
Safe to say this person flushed $320,000 down the toilet?Benzinga - 42 minutes ago: 10 Consumer Discretionary Stocks With Unusual Options Alerts In Today's Session
Excerpt:
Regarding TSLA (NASDAQ:TSLA), we observe a call option trade with bullish sentiment. It expires in 1 day(s) on January 22, 2021. A trader bought 400 contract(s) at a $850.00 strike. The trader or institution spent $320.0K on this trade with a price of $800.0 per contract. There were 7341 open contracts at this strike prior to today, and today 24961 contract(s) were bought and sold.
Sure seems like it to me.Safe to say this person flushed $320,000 down the toilet?
Not at all. Could easily have been part of some more complex bet that made this person a pile of money. No way to tell.Safe to say this person flushed $320,000 down the toilet?
It does rain in Fremont, but I think the lack of a roof is an indication of how much heat is produced by these gigapresses - so much that an overhead roof would cause heat issues with the surrounding structure.
Tony has 15% per year in the 2020s. However batteries have been doing 20% price drops per year.
Battery Day has 54% cost reduction, but 7% is the structural battery. So say 49%.
Taking Tony's numbers over 3 years the cost is around 61%.
Assuming Tesla battery day tech takes 3 years we get to the same 61%.
However, I still, expect higher drops in the retail price of energy storage batteries, that is because a shortage of supply is helping to keep prices high and slowing the adoption curve.
Tesla is also switching chemistries for grid scale energy storage from Nickel to Iron for grid scale energy storage.
Tesla themselves talk about changing the curve.
Add in chemistry changes, higher production volumes, Tesla has an opportunity to grow market share while retaining margins.
Competitors have to respond, the amount of battery research at all stages of production is staggering. So what we can expect is the whole industry chasing reduced costs very aggressively. With lots of time, money and effort spent on the problem.
Tony is more often right than wrong but my hunch is 15% per year is conservative, especially for energy storage batteries.