Buckminster
Well-Known Member
I think they have continued the same gap down for aesthetic purposes.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think they have continued the same gap down for aesthetic purposes.
I think Tesla wants to avoid creating a market for entry to these events. It's a lottery to get in, not an auction.I agree a little bit here...as I'm only a few hours away from Austin in Dallas, but out of all these YouTubers to get in to every event, it should be Gali. Hell, Ross Gruber got it in....
I saw that months ago and mentioned how it was on my updated wish list when I saw it on the EF-150. I think it was the video of when they were doing the GigaTX opening? And if true It was a beautiful adjustment. Now "Heavy Sh!te" like bags of concrete can be put in there out of the elements while the bed can be used for other stuff..or not at all. And talk about a place to sit and watch the kids soccer game while out of the elements..or tailgating in reverse..or TWO tailgate parties... Adults and children.
Perhaps correct and a higher entry point supports buoyancy better.I think they have continued the same gap down for aesthetic purposes.
I am 99% certain that the vault cover does not slide into the cabin.Comment just posted on DriveTeslaCanada's article about the CyberTruck. Cool if true:
View attachment 912676
Almost anything Tesla does can be reduced to First Principles logic.
1. A good truck should be resistant to scratches, dings, dents, etc.
2. A good EV should have an aerodynamic shape.
3. Ultra-hardened cold-worked steel alloys are resistant to scratches, dings, dents, etc.
4. Hardened steel cannot be effectively stamped, but can be folded.
5. Folded panels require an angular shape.
6. Therefore, a good EV truck must be made out of hardened steel folded into an angular, aerodynamic shape.
Almost anything Tesla does can be reduced to First Principles logic.
1. A good truck should be resistant to scratches, dings, dents, etc.
2. A good EV should have an aerodynamic shape.
3. Ultra-hardened cold-worked steel alloys are resistant to scratches, dings, dents, etc.
4. Hardened steel cannot be effectively stamped, but can be folded.
5. Folded panels require an angular shape.
6. Therefore, a good EV truck must be made out of hardened steel folded into an angular, aerodynamic shape.
Not a single thing in that list is "first principles". Easy to tell because there's no physics.Almost anything Tesla does can be reduced to First Principles logic.
1. A good truck should be resistant to scratches, dings, dents, etc.
2. A good EV should have an aerodynamic shape.
3. Ultra-hardened cold-worked steel alloys are resistant to scratches, dings, dents, etc.
4. Hardened steel cannot be effectively stamped, but can be folded.
5. Folded panels require an angular shape.
6. Therefore, a good EV truck must be made out of hardened steel folded into an angular, aerodynamic shape.
Why don't legacy makers use gigacastings? Why did Ford not make a structural battery on their first swing? Why do most EVs from legacy makers not have enough room for a proper frunk or storage under their rear cargo area?So why are gas trucks not built like that? What makes the CT design uniquely electric?
To praphrase an old saying (and this is my paraphrasing), If it's broke don't fix it...if it requires like effort, or work, or money, and the customer does not have a choice.So why are gas trucks not built like that? What makes the CT design uniquely electric?
Dont forget some consumers that think "Pickup truck must look certain way. Ugh, Ugh."Why don't legacy makers use gigacastings? Why did Ford not make a structural battery on their first swing? Why do most EVs from legacy makers not have enough room for a proper frunk or storage under their rear cargo area?
It's not about Tesla being electric. Legacy auto has engaged in group-think for some time and nobody has been willing to risk stepping outside traditional manufacturing techniques.
And then they drive or ride in one...Dont forget some consumers that think "Pickup truck must look certain way. Ugh, Ugh."
I met a GM vehicle artist/designer on a plane (long time ago). He was very frustrated that he came up with so many original designs and looks, but they were never considered. Paraphrasing his answer (in case someone here might have overheard me on that plane in the 80's) "GM is afraid to take any risks."Dont forget some consumers that think "Pickup truck must look certain way. Ugh, Ugh."
Traditional truck buyers don't like seeing big changes for sure. Heck, look at Ram still selling two model designs (gen 4 and 5) with gen 4 not much different than the gen 2 from 1994. Crazy stuff.I met a GM vehicle artist/designer on a plane (long time ago). He was very frustrated that he came up with so many original designs and looks, but they were never considered. Paraphrasing his answer (in case someone here might have overheard me on that plane in the 80's) "GM is afraid to take any risks."
I'm sure Tesla did their homework on the pricing model for charging non-Tesla vehicles....but I'd rather the subscription cost $14.99 or even $19.99 per month.