You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
California too.FTFY.
You been tested, bruh?
I was thinking about waiting, but I can't wait any more. I'll upgrade the 2020 S to a future 500+ range when TSLA goes over $1K a share.
Don't worry, I'm sure he can fix that.Elon has broken 33m Twitter followers.
Ya know, I read that article on their "proprietary Ultium batteries" and all I could find was they were in a different format/shape, and hoping for no cobalt to reduce costs (which wasn't that a claim already made by Tesla and in the works?)Lol, I read GM is going to build EVs for Honda:
GM to build EVs for Honda | 1 day ago
"Honda to customize GM EV platform, use GM's recently unveiled battery technology; GM to build Honda vehicles. Detroit, Michigan – General Motors (GM) and Honda will jointly develop two electric vehicles (EVs) for Honda, based on GM's flexible global EV platform powered by proprietary Ultium batteries."
Cheers!
wait, was this a
Or thay may take that odea pf supplying skateboards to other OEMs. I wish them luckDon't worry, I'm sure he can fix that.
Ya know, I read that article on their "proprietary Ultium batteries" and all I could find was they were in a different format/shape, and hoping for no cobalt to reduce costs (which wasn't that a claim already made by Tesla and in the works?)
In essence, GM is creating a battery Brand Name based upon their R&D goals, and marketing it like it's the Eveready Bunny. This can work in generating hype (b/c who really understands how much energy is in those AA batteries, or what's a Watt-Hr), but I think it will always boil down to cost and range for the consumer at point of sale, then features. I guess she needed to respond with something at GM, and a cloak of secrecy (for the next decade maybe) around battery technology was a logical response. In theory, solve battery - solve sales, so it's believable for the mass market. I bet they come up with a new metric for confusing the consumer (just like the audio business did with amplifier specs). Maybe something like battery density (b/c of new packs).
It would be nice if Tesla made cars that actually got their supposed range. There are any number of threads on this subject. The class action suit will be a fudsters dream. Check current thread in Model S driving.The latest Raven+ Model S (March 2020) is rated EPA: 390 mi (630 km) NEDC: 443 mi (713 km).
The MIC LR Model 3, (if Bloomberg's report is accurate) will not match even match what the range of the current Model S (which has +10% more NEDC rated range)
The Model S is the flagship, and will always continue its march toward perfection. Its what they do, and how they're made.
Never had any problem with getting the range on the S I just traded in. Had it for seven years, 130K miles. Actually, I switched to Ideal miles because that was closer to reality. If you drive like Gilles Villeneuve, you're not going to get EPA numbers.It would be nice if Tesla made cars that actually got their supposed range. There are any number of threads on this subject. The class action suit will be a fudsters dream. Check current thread in Model S driving.
The Ultium battery chemistry is NCU811, Nickel, Cobalt, Unobtainium.Don't worry, I'm sure he can fix that.
Ya know, I read that article on their "proprietary Ultium batteries" and all I could find was they were in a different format/shape, and hoping for no cobalt to reduce costs (which wasn't that a claim already made by Tesla and in the works?)
In essence, GM is creating a battery Brand Name based upon their R&D goals, and marketing it like it's the Eveready Bunny. This can work in generating hype (b/c who really understands how much energy is in those AA batteries, or what's a Watt-Hr), but I think it will always boil down to cost and range for the consumer at point of sale, then features. I guess she needed to respond with something at GM, and a cloak of secrecy (for the next decade maybe) around battery technology was a logical response. In theory, solve battery - solve sales, so it's believable for the mass market. I bet they come up with a new metric for confusing the consumer (just like the audio business did with amplifier specs). Maybe something like battery density (b/c of new packs).
Would be nice if ICE cars got their supposed range, but you conveniently overlook that.It would be nice if Tesla made cars that actually got their supposed range. There are any number of threads on this subject. The class action suit will be a fudsters dream. Check current thread in Model S driving.
My model X at 58k miles has a greater 90% range than when i got it-- does the class action go both ways?It would be nice if Tesla made cars that actually got their supposed range. There are any number of threads on this subject. The class action suit will be a fudsters dream. Check current thread in Model S driving.
As others have noted this is based on NEDC the European standard which significantly inflates range compared to EPA numbers.Bloomberg reporting 400 mi MIC model 3. Confirmation?
My model X at 58k miles has a greater 90% range than when i got it-- does the class action go both ways?
I can confirm cheetah mode is in the new update for the Raven Model X Performance. Just got the 2020.12.5 update last night, can’t wait to use it.It may please our feline users that Raven S&X gets a new cheetah launch mode:
green on Twitter
View attachment 529222
In addition to annoying me and costing me money, TSLA being held down Friday gave the macros a couple days to plummet.The major indices ended up red today, but TSLA gained 5,66%. Yesterday many longs were crying manipulation. Is today shorties turn to cry foul play?
Can’t we just conclude that the stock price eventually finds its rightful place, despite of all the strings being pulled?
The major indices ended up red today, but TSLA gained 5,66%. Yesterday many longs were crying manipulation. Is today shorties turn to cry foul play?
In addition to annoying me and costing me money, TSLA being held down Friday gave the macros a couple days to plummet.
Can't we just have no obvious manipulation?
Why should anyone suffer from these obvious manipulations?I’m not saying there is no manipulation on a daily basis, especially around expiry. But as Papafox says, the stock price eventually corrects and finds the place it deserves. It can be frustrating (and costly) for short term players, but long term hodlers probably do not suffer from these manipulations.