Knightshade
Well-Known Member
Man I cringe every time I see someone make a VW short squeeze comparison.
The VW thing was because Porsche secretly bought up so much of the company that they suddenly announced "Oh, hey, we bought up nearly all the shares out there other than the 20% owned by Lower Saxony- so now there's actually only 6% float on the market total, but the stock is shorted at 12%....that might be issue for some shorts so we wanted to mention it, FYI"
So soon after the announcement the stock shot up about 5x (around 210E per share to a bit over 1000)....after which Porsche released 5% of their shares back to the market to ease the squeeze, such that the stock had dropped back under 500 by end of the same week, and was back down to ~200 a month or two later right where it began.... (also Porsche made a TON of money selling that 5% of shares to desperate shorts...)
Unless someone secretly bought up like 77% of the Tesla shares NOT owned by Elon the comparison makes no sense.
The rising stock price certainly hurts the shorts...a lot... (and has been for a while now)... an S&P spike certainly hurts the shorts.... (and who knows, maybe the dividend thing somehow hurts em or makes them think it will or whatever folks keep debating).
But there's no circumstances here like the VW 5x SP in 2 days situation... (and thankfully also no "goes right back to where it'd been sitting after" situation either....) because there's simply, by quite a bit, more floated shares than short interest.
They keep having to pay more for the shares, but unlike the VW situation, plenty of shares exist to buy
Last edited: