I did the same in 2018, never again, can't time Tesla, period.I'm planning on the same.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I did the same in 2018, never again, can't time Tesla, period.I'm planning on the same.
If there were 2.4m shares net covered yesterday the share price would have moved a lot higher. Total volume traded was only 5m shares.
Spiegel's TSLA position is probably worth less than $10m, or to use @schonelucht monetary units: Spiegel's fund is worth about half a mousenut.
If Tesla was a micro cap then Spiegel would probably already have been squeezed out of his short position years ago, and he would have plenty of access to toilets in his day job to support his triple digit net worth.
But TSLA won't get bid up to squeeze a $10m position, as those with $100m and $1,000m and $10,000m positions would probably resist.
Spiegel, a Trump supporter, is a classic conspiracy theory nutjob grown on modern social media. The difference is that while most of the other peddlers of conspiracy theories try to maintain a healthy degree of separation from the truth value of their con and gain their income through advertising, merchandise and outright scamming of supporters; Spiegel seems to believe his own scam and has invested accordingly - which won't end well if we are right.
typically stay out of ER moves, but ive got a 280 put to cover a drop against my 100 shares, looking to pick up a handful of 275-80 calls later today. bullish on ER, but can trust media to not it somehow
Just sold non-core holding. Thank you, euphoria, thank you so muchLooks like short sellers are selling:
$TSLA short int is $10.17 bn; 39.10 mm shs shorted; 29.69% of float; 0.90% borrow fee. Shs shorted are down -1.7 mm, -4.10%, over the past week as stock price rose +3.09%. We saw 2.4 mm shs of short covering yesterday. Shorts are down -$1.50 bn in mark-to-market losses in July
Ihor Dusaniwsky on Twitter
Pure speculation here, but I think that there's a small possibility that Tesla believes the value of Full Self Driving (based off of increased/improved feature set) is going to increase somewhat significantly in the near future, and that's why they have removed it from all CPO Tesla's they currently have on hand.
There are two facilities in Lathrop. The older one is the manufacturing space (I think). The new one is huge and has been describes here as being a parts facility. I've never bought that. First it's too large. Also I would locate parts warehouses distributed around the country.That was already confirmed in the latest impact report:
With 431K sq ft of manufacturing space, Tesla’s Lathrop facility in California hosts computer numerical control (CNC) operations, machining and castings manufacturing.
It doesn't really make sense to sell CPOs with EAP, since that feature no longer exists on new cars. I assume these CPOs will include AP, just like new ones.So apparently there's no more FSD or Enhanced Autopilot on any CPO Teslas:
No more FSD for any "CPO" Teslas
There's speculation in that thread that they're just testing what the value of FSD/Enhanced Autopilot are in the market, but I did notice that all AP 1.0 vehicles that previously had Autopilot still currently have 'Autopilot with convenience features' still listed on them.
Pure speculation here, but I think that there's a small possibility that Tesla believes the value of Full Self Driving (based off of increased/improved feature set) is going to increase somewhat significantly in the near future, and that's why they have removed it from all CPO Tesla's they currently have on hand.
Thanks for cutting out the part immediately beforehand... my full sentence was:
"Pure speculation here, but I think that there's a small possibility that Tesla believes the value of Full Self Driving (based off of increased/improved feature set) is going to increase somewhat significantly in the near future, and that's why they have removed it from all CPO Tesla's they currently have on hand."
I just need $268 to get back above even. I'm not even going to pretend to know what's going to happen tonight but it will only matter until Q3 results, and then that will only matter until Q4 results.
Lathrop has always been manufacturing plus some warehousing. Previous 10-Ks listed four separate facilities, the most recent one combined the three leased buildings into a single item:There are two facilities in Lathrop. The older one is the manufacturing space (I think). The new one is huge and has been describes here as being a parts facility. I've never bought that. First it's too large. Also I would locate parts warehouses distributed around the country.
ThanksLathrop has always been manufacturing plus some warehousing. Previous 10-Ks listed four separate facilities, the most recent one combined the three leased buildings into a single item:
Lathrop, California 885,867 sqft Warehouse and manufacturing (leased)
Lathrop, California 496,888 sqft Manufacturing (owned)
It then says: "We will begin leasing …. a 0.9 million square feet warehouse and manufacturing facility in Lathrop, California for an initial term of 11.5 years upon construction completion...".
Either that or they feel CPO cars have become more desirable/valuable.So apparently there's no more FSD or Enhanced Autopilot on any CPO Teslas:
No more FSD for any "CPO" Teslas
There's speculation in that thread that they're just testing what the value of FSD/Enhanced Autopilot are in the market, but I did notice that all AP 1.0 vehicles that previously had Autopilot still currently have 'Autopilot with convenience features' still listed on them.
Pure speculation here, but I think that there's a small possibility that Tesla believes the value of Full Self Driving (based off of increased/improved feature set) is going to increase somewhat significantly in the near future, and that's why they have removed it from all CPO Tesla's they currently have on hand.
Either that or they feel CPO cars have become more desirable/valuable.
A drop could be a possibility based just on financials (minus FCF), which will definitely be peddled by CNBC for the next few days.Call me a creature of habit, dry powder available ready for the obligatory SP drop following the ER call.
Here comes the CNBC pre-earnings Tesla bashing (focusing on the decline in Model S sales in California story). CNBC does not even try to hide its bias any longer.
Unfortunately, I believe there are bots programed to follow CNBC.Does anyone under the age of 60 even watch CNBC?