You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I was referring to the tweet you quoted first (second one was a joke about the 420 value).Please provide a reference for that quote.
I know he's said "Tesla stock price is too high imo" before the split.
"Whoa … the stock is so high lol"
And has said that Tesla is priced based on future growth. And that the Hertz deal shouldn't have increased the stock price. But not an unquaified too high.
I agree. We are all adults who most definitely dont need to bicker all day over something so far out of our control. I say anyone who is comfortable with Elon’s new role at TWTR, keep your TSLA. Anyone thinking its a ticking timed bomb, sell it.Can we also ask those constantly insisting that abdication-of-CEO-feduciary-duty-is-perfectly-ok also give it a rest? I'll chill on my end.
Uhhh...nope. Gotta disagree here. A happy and challenged Elon is best for TSLA shareholders, and a busy Elon is a happy Elon.> If the guy wants to turn Twitter into a powerhouse, that is fair and balanced for all users,
As CEO of Tesla, it is not fair and balanced for him to be spending his focus trying to turn a different privately-held company into a powerhouse
I didn't even know there was an insider lockup for rivian expiring this weekend. Gonna be an ugly Monday!
Think Ford will buy TSLA with the cash?
Ford is selling 8 million shares of once high-flying EV maker Rivian, sources say
Ford Motor is selling 8 million of its Rivian Automotive shares as the insider lockup for the stock expires on Sunday, sources told CNBC's David Faber.www.cnbc.com
...Energy, transportation, communications, finance and labor interests ... they'll all be coming after him....
But I agree the media attacks on him will get worse as he continues to eat the lunch of Earth's industrial establishment.
There is a contradiction between what Elon said and what you say up here...
Those who were the least skeptical about Elon Musk's claims, would in fact have believed him when he said those exact words: "the stock is too high".
Which was BEFORE the big runup that sent the stock up something like 18x within a 12 month period.
Therefore, making the biggest gains on Tesla did require some skepticism about his words!
I’ve never invested in a company unless I trusted the CEO would do the right thing for shareholders.I have never seen a publicly traded company where the shareholders hoped that their CEO would get a lot of new daytime hobbies to distract him from leading the company and thus prove the company is "mature". You folks are nuts.
Musk should leave the CEO job at Tesla. Last year nothing has happened, from a customers pov. Just small not important things. It would have been possible to have come longer with CT and Roadster. He seems tired and more interested in other things.
And that Twitter investor talk that "you will triple your money", is as believeable as FSD. He really should stop lying if he wants to be liked from more than the cult.
AND, Twitter shouldnt be a one man show. He will "protect free speach". LOL... He should talk to Putin then, he does the same in Russia, has decades of experience.
Anybody know if he will be co-founder of Twitter?
In May of 2020 the OP on this forum predicted a bad upcoming Q2 2020 quarter for Tesla because the company "is bleeding money". So you may be right that he might have missed out on the huge appreciation that was about to happen.Your words are those of a Tesla hater who missed out on the investment opportunity of a lifetime. In my experience, the same people are likely to miss out on TSLA's appreciation going forward as well. Because those people don't understand the company and think it's over-valued. You can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink. Which I'm just fine with.
This literally and figuratively isn't rocket science.You don't seem to understand the fundamental conflict of interest.
Tesla shareholders own the rights to Dojo because it was built at Tesla and Tesla is a public company. By being CEO, of both sides of the negotiation Elon has the authority to force a deal thru that Tesla never would have made with Twitter if he wasn't in charge of Tesla. That's the definition of cronyism and literally self-dealing. Even if the deal is fair, it risks lawsuits because it looks crooked unless whatever is being sold or licensed is made available to every other company at the same price including all of Twitters would-be competitors.
And it is a complete distraction from the best interest of Tesla which needs their best and brightest working on Teslas problems, not solving Twitters.
I was referring to the tweet you quoted first (second one was a joke about the 420 value).
The first one is equivalent to what I wrote, the only verbatim difference is the explicit use of the word "price" which is semantically implied when one says "stock is too high" -- it is obvious that the shorter version of the statement is not meant to refer to a stock certificate being placed on a high shelf or something similarly silly, but to mean exactly the same as the more explicit (but functionally equivalent) statement "stock price is too high".
I was quoting the exact phrase, that @StealthP3D used in the post I was replying to -- no misquote there *see Spoiler below.In general, I will complain when quote marks are used around an inexact quote (thus, not a quote)*.
With hindsight of a split which (momentarily) reduced the share price, not the market cap, it is even more critical to use full quote to capture meaning.
The people who made the most money were the least skeptical about Elon Musk's claims and abilities. They didn't say "Oh, no, the stock is too high, Elon is overworked, no one man can do so much, I better sell it all."
Those who were the least skeptical about Elon Musk's claims, would in fact have believed him when he said those exact words: "the stock is too high".
I do hope you are right. I hope that the Twitter acquisition really is part of a much bigger plan.I am personally overjoyed that Elon is buying Twitter. I think Tesla shareholders should be too.
Bigger fish than Ford and GM will be coming for us soon. Energy, transportation, communications, finance and labor interests ... they'll all be coming after him. He needs a big media stick to defend himself and Tesla if he wants to disrupt the planet.
I'd love to see Twitter do crowd-sourced neutral investigative journalism. If he can claim the middle, then independent voters will be interested in his political endorsements. Both parties will be hesitant to attack Elon and Tesla's interests. We're playing in the bigs now. Votes are needed to shape the bureaucracy.
Ignore Elon's comments about free speech and not needing to make money on Twitter. Once he gets going on this his competitive spirits will take over. Twitter could someday be the biggest and most valuable media company in the world.