Mark to market for bank capital adequacy and Rick exposure can and sometimes does differ materially from GAAP. Specifically, measures such as probability of payment (pop), loss given default (llgd) are used in risk asset classification in bank examination but not used in that way in GAAP. Similarly liability risk has rate, liquidity and valuation components in bank assessment that have no direct counterparts in GAAP. That is why all this tends to be referred to as CAMEL ratings. These are obscure but nit secret just as bank consent decrees are not technically secret.Hmm, other sources say that financial reporting requirements for bonds is the opposite (bolded above), that is bonds are reported at their book value based on maturity. We discussed this here at TMC during the first Tesla Bitcoin write-down episode. Are the requirements for Banks different than other public Companies? Care to elaborate? TIA.
Thanks for that! The CAMELS acronym stands for "Capital adequacy, Asset quality, Management, Earnings, Liquidity, and Sensitivity". Source:
CAMELS Rating System: What It Is, How It Is Calculated | Investopedia.com
Cheers!
These are some reasons why SVB was NOT a surprise, nor was Signature. People who watch that tend to avoid discussing this unless a bank fails because poor CAMEL ratings can be and usually are repaired without failure. Failures, though, do usually happen with warning if only people were paying attention.