How about this one?Some of Dan Ives fav quotes:
"Line in the Sand"
"Sum of Parts"
"Green Tidal Wave"
"China is Key"
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about this one?Some of Dan Ives fav quotes:
"Line in the Sand"
"Sum of Parts"
"Green Tidal Wave"
"China is Key"
Yeah I like this guy's perspective, too. Definitely worth a read, especially the first paragraph: "Guidance creates pressure that leads to inefficient action. EOQ rushes, trying to hit short-term numbers on a specific day, is a game that disadvantages a company's efficient long-term execution on a mission and likely hurts long-term growth/value. Guidance is necessary to pump stock value short term and is also expected. I get it. However, this granular guidance is not as essential for long-term holders. Tesla has $29 billion cash on hand. I read the absence of guidance as a result of a strong cash position, strong fundamentals, and focus on the long-term plot with increasing disregard for expected standards. Capital expenditures increasing with confidence also shows no headwinds, and confidence remains strong in long-term value creation. Anyone who knows Tesla knows the play is in big long-term transformative bets, not short-term forgettable wins."My ONLY negative takeaway from yesterday was the removal of the 50% average annual growth guidance.
Edit: just saw this brilliant tweet, giving a great argument for removing detailed guidance, among other things. It’s from unplugged performance.
Physically, it is possible, if Tesla were to come up with some new manufacturing technique/process that greatly increases the volumetric density and efficiency of a factory, move to smaller vehicles, and increase speed and automation of the GA lines, like how Elon described some crazy futuristic alien manufacturing juggernaut in the past. Anyway, if anyone can do it, I bet it would be Tesla working with that guy who docks his reusable rockets to the international space station. We'll see soon enough.There is no possibility of Tesla delivering 2.58M units this year, the capacity simply isn't anywhere close to there. 2.1M to 2.2M is much more probable for 2024, with a tad higher in 2025 (maybe 2.3M to 2.4M) due to CT and maybe some Gen3. Then in 2026 we should see the Gen 3 ramping proper out of Austin, which should likely push us closer to 3M. If Gen3 production in other factories starts in 2027 then that would be the year unit growth blasts off again.
My feeling is 20M by 2030 is off the table now, I don't see how it can happen anymore. New factory construction is happening too slowly, and the delay on 4680 ramping has pushed back both CT and Gen3. I think more like 12M - 15M is much more likely by 2030.
All IMHO of course
longevity of the business , food is a basic need And Costco offers best prices.That's cute
Google gross margin is 56%, revenue growth is 11%. Their net margin is almost 2x of Costco's gross margins. Tell me why it has a PE ratio 17 points lower than Costco?
Costco, Walmart, Target, Amazon retail...all of these companies are just logistic companies at heart. They don't really invent or make anything and the innovation are all logistic related.longevity of the business , food is a basic need And Costco offers best prices.
it’s an expensive stock, frankly.
And finally life is a mystery , just accept it.
Amazons retail business makes no money as I understand. All the profit is AWSCostco, Walmart, Target, Amazon retail...all of these companies are just logistic companies at heart. They don't really invent or make anything and the innovation are all logistic related.
So the moral of the story is wall street assign many companies with random PEs regardless of margins/revenue growth or profits.
?Amazons retail business makes no money as I understand. All the profit is AWS
Unclear if you are trying to prove me correct or if you are interpreting “makes no money” to mean no revenue.?
How Amazon Makes Money
Amazon’s biggest source of revenue is ecommerce, but cloud services currently generates all of the company’s operating income.www.investopedia.com
There is no possibility of Tesla delivering 2.58M units this year, the capacity simply isn't anywhere close to there.
If you want temperature measurement per X number of cells, only the pack size (cell count) matters, not the arrangement.And not sure you'd need less BMS chips... The needed power dictates the number of cells, not the voltage. For a given KWh pack you need fewer bricks of cells in series, but you need double the cells in parallel (i.e. more current capacity) in each brick. I suspect that means 2X temp sensors to monitor...
My feeling is 20M by 2030 is off the table now, I don't see how it can happen anymore. New factory construction is happening too slowly, and the delay on 4680 ramping has pushed back both CT and Gen3. I think more like 12M - 15M is much more likely by 2030.
Robotaxi will happen about 4-5 years after FSD can be trusted without a driver, becuase it'll take that long to get through the regulatory environment.
Optimus crawling into cars with a vacuum, cleaning them, wiping interior services while not damaging anything ? sure. cool stuff. let's talk in 2030+ again.
Tesla insurance isn't run by Tesla... they outsource it to insurance providers and just label it Tesla insurance but Tesla isn't the underwriter.
In my opinion, private Tesla owners won't be able to put their cars into the fleet
Tesla description of FSD shown to you during purchase for years said:Please note also that using a self-driving Tesla for car sharing and ride hailing for friends and family is fine, but doing so for revenue purposes will only be permissible on the Tesla Network, details of which will be released next year
People read this incorrectly.
I found the last analyst question asking about margins to be insufferable. I was rolling my eyes thinking what a boring question and I’m sure Elon was biting his tongue hahaI found it a good conference call. Boring is good. No drama is good. I’m not in the business of predicting next quarter’s numbers, so I’m fine with no guidance.
Sure it is, have you done the math? If we take only last years actuals and exit run rates (N.B. Shanghai Dec '23 wholesale was 93.5K units, or 1.1M annualized) all we need to do is bring up Giga Texas Model Y Production to the existing level of Giga Berlin. Here's the numbers:
View attachment 1012352
Question is, will Tesla want to do it? Of course! They'be already invested 100% of the CapEx required to build this capacity, all they have to do is continue to run it at 2023's 'exit rate' and bring TX up to match Berlin...
and TX is getting 100GWh of 4680 cell capacity by mid-year, already at 25 GWh with just one production line (+2 test lines are extra, installing the 4th line as we speak). Plus, Drew told us YESTERDAY that they are weeks ahead on 4680 production vs needs for CT.
Depends if they commit to serious education and awareness campaigns. Without that not very likely.I hate to say it ... but ... is there demand for 2.5M units of CT, S, X, 3 Y? Unclear. Pierre Ferrague actually asked that question and the team basically said they didn't know. Also, good luck running all factories at 100% utilization!