Couldn’t agree more .Yup. I feel like people want to avoid applying the same common sense principles to Tesla / Musk as they would elsewhere.
For instance, in many companies more slack is allowed for employees that are high performers that have been there a long time.
If I have a employee who is high performing, they can do whatever they want / however they want as long as they get their work done.
But if suddenly that works stops getting done, what happens? The reigns tighten. This is almost always the case, anywhere.
So if I was seeing an employee and the company underperforming, maybe becuase they were distracted tweeting too much, I would definitely be wanted to change their priorities.
The most ironic part is Elon himself - knowing how he operates (look at all the recent layoffs) - do you think he would have accepted the recent performance of the CEO of Tesla?
Could you imagine if Musk saw the CEO of Boring Company or Neuralink spending half their time on another company AND on a public social media platform making a bunch of tweets?
Elon Musk would have fired himself.
It’s only fair to apply the Fairness doctrine to everyone equally .
Have always supported Tesla and will continue to do so , no matter who is at the helm. I came to Tesla to support the mission and will stay with and for it. Having Elon at the helm to guide the ship is a bonus and understand he will not be there forever . No one person is bigger than the mission .
I hope Elon reads this thread .