What parts do you agree with and what parts don’t you?
1. Seems to be at least in part. Perhaps not as much as it used to be a few decades ago.
2. That’s factual all day long, every day, and directly from IF Metall.
3.
That would be unsurprising if true.
4. Often has been the experience of people and the reality in this day and age. In context the words and actions of this union definitely give the impression they don’t care one bit about any union member. So when they take money from workers, build a billion dollar ‘just in case’ war chest, then go after Tesla for not ‘voluntarily’ signing a collective agreement that Tesla doesn’t have to sign, force workers to sympathy strike that have no dog in the fight causing those workers to lose their jobs, cause companies to lose business, remove workers from union membership for not striking - what word do you want to use?
5. Actions and words clearly indicate that’s true in this case.
6.
It stands to reason, though, that workers who don’t have to work/have the freedom to decide to work or not would be a lot less likely swayed by a union’s demands to strike. Financial security definitely changes how a person moves through life.
7. Hate may be the wrong word, but I think we can agree that unions don’t speak lovingly or fondly of a person of Elon’s influence who stands as opposition to their existence.
8. Law of Jante seems to apply at least in part.