bdy0627
Active Member
We need to see how this trades after the standard morning dip. Still too early to tell IMO.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There are longs buying stock, just like there are shorts covering.
There's just more longs profit taking and more shorts taking new positions ( at least as a net sum)
I have had similar thoughts regarding rolling J19s. I set up a separate thread for anyone brave enough to publicly estimate higher than $700 in April. 43 viewings so far without any takers. Please don't make me the next 007...What are people with calls doing ?
For one thing, as one would expect the IV has sharply gone down, now that ER is over. $300 for me is about break-even - so, if I sell now I'd just roll over my J19s to probably March '19.
I'll hold my stock until SP hits 4k
View attachment 346859
I'm sort of looking forward to it at this point.Shorts are really going to try and get this under 300$ by end of week..caution.
In my opinion, there should be at least 30 institutions/billionaires right now investing >$500 millions in Tesla. So minimum 15 billion dollars of capital flowing into TSLA. Which is not the case as of right now.
Why ?
Because institutions are professional traders, implying they have discipline not to buy huge amounts of stock in one go after a big event.In my opinion, there should be at least 30 institutions/billionaires right now investing >$500 millions in Tesla. So minimum 15 billion dollars of capital flowing into TSLA. Which is not the case as of right now.
Why ?
I've been thinking about what this means:
"We are aiming to bring portions of Model 3 production to China during 2019 and to progressively increase the level of localization through local
sourcing and manufacturing."
What's the logical priority for China to complete first?
* Overhead. A factory is not just particular production lines, but all of the transport, utility, and other supporting infrastructure that the factory is useless without. Big focus for the next couple quarters.
* GA line. This is obvious - they have to complete the vehicles there to gain the local manufacturing benefits, so they need at least a single GA line. GA is also one of the production constraints at Fremont. Tesla demonstrated the ability to make a GA line in a matter of months with GA4. I expect a GA line to start up there shockingly fast - not Q4, but Q2-3.
* Paint shop. This is the other big bottleneck at Fremont. Tesla can divert BIWs straight to export to Shanghai. Wouldn't be surprised in the least to see a local paint shop open up in Q4. Maybe even Q3, but I'd bet on Q4; paint shops are pretty complicated and require a lot of fine tuning to get consistently good results.
AFAIK, Fremont has never been limited by stamping or plastics, and apart from one short period early on, not welding either. Giga seems to be capable of scaling easily and effectively indefinitely, so GF3 production of packs and motors is obviously not going to be a priority. But with a GA line and paint shop in Shanghai, they should be able to significantly expand their total global output.
Wouldn't be surprised to see Giga 4 construction starting much faster than people are expecting, using the exact same approach.
There's a reason Tesla has walked back focus on 10k at Fremont (I've noticed analysts keep missing this part): because they can start up production "not at Fremont" surprisingly quickly. Not full production, but it doesn't need to be. I see Tesla scaling Fremont to 7k/wk sustained by Q1/Q2, with future scaling Model 3 scaling focused first on Shanghai, then Germany. Whenever they can't squeeze more production out of a given line at Fremont without a significant capital investment, a corresponding line will be built at Giga 3 or 4 for it.
I don't understand why people are so focused on the shorting. What about the longs ?
Why isn't there a few billionaires/institutions pouring hundreds of millions/billions of dollars of their capital into Tesla right now ?
That's a point not enough of people here are focusing on I think.
In my opinion, there should be at least 30 institutions/billionaires right now investing >$500 millions in Tesla. So minimum 15 billion dollars of capital flowing into TSLA. Which is not the case as of right now.
Why ?
You’re like the 4th person to mention stamping since the call. The chances of stamping parts next year there is very low. If they manage it, you’d be talking q4, Christmas.
You can do analysis of multi-layer NN.This is a very fundamental philosophical question in FSD, but my personal feeling is NN should never be used to drive.
NN is perfect for perception, because perception is too big a problem to define by rules, and it can tolerate failures.
But using NN to drive has a huge issue, it's that we don't have a framework to make NN explainable, also you could argue as soon as you make an NN explainable, you already converted it into a decision tree.
People who try to go after AGI don't understand it, people who do don't even think about making it. AGI is not an instrument for autonomous driving or to do anything of a kind actually.If you want to bring the "trolly car" problem into the discussion to make a point for NN, I will say we would have AGI by the time NN can solve that, and by that time, we don't need FSD cars anymore, tunnels and rockets takes you anywhere you want to go, if you still need to go places at all.
*EDIT: typos*
at least that makes TSLA actually look pretty goodHere's what that YTD comparison of Tesla vs. other automakers looks like now:
![]()
"New Investment $"
I'm confused...why is this thing dropping after all this GREAT news? Why are scared bulls selling when Q4 is about to huge, too?
I'm confused...why is this thing dropping after all this GREAT news? Why are scared bulls selling when Q4 is about to huge, too?
Where exactly does "New Investment" come in???