Yinn
Active Member
Would you have gotten the MS40? I would take that over the Bolt.
We wanted dual motors, so it wasn't an option for us. Otherwise, of course.
There is no doubt about it, unless you can get a discounted inventory vehicle for your 90d at around $95K, you just don't get the 90d now that the 100d is out.
The same could be said of the 75 as well when compared to the 60. Which is why I did a 60-> 75/90/100 calculation.
I think financially it's beyond just the end monthly payment/cash price number though. Otherwise, we'd probably be suggesting a Model S with rear facing seats that would offer just about the same utility and better efficiency.
We're probably more focused on the value proposition. The overall value of a 100D is on par with the 60D. That's in pure terms of what you pay for vs what you get. Neither the 75D or the 90D approaches the same value, the only reason to settle for a 75D would be if there is no value to you in the 100D. Especially since my calculation only takes into account range and doesn't even account for performance.
I just realized...this discussion would probably sound silly if we applied it to your BMW.
I'm not sure what you have, but for the sake of my scenario; let's say you have a 2013 BMW 528i for 518 mi of range. If you wanted to step up to a 550i, you would have to give up 148 mi of range and 29% in efficiency (20mpg vs 28mpg) and it would cost you an additional $15,000 to do so.