I agree. Even though guidance was for lower numbers in Q1, the market would still hammer TSLA if they don't have higher numbers than Q4, especially with current market conditions. I can only imagine the bear FUD that would come out if numbers are lower in Q1 than Q4 (demand sinking for Tesla, Tesla production declining, etc.) despite this being guided by the company with reasons given. Showing improvement Q on Q maintains the overall positive momentum.
I believe that this sentiment is widely held in this community, and more broadly in the investment community. In fact, I even believe that it's true myself.
My question though is does it matter? And what does "hammered" actually mean?
If Tesla reported lower deliveries due to lots of cars in transit and being delivered early in Q2, and that the pipeline will be filling as the company won't be wasting resources cramming deliveries into the end of the quarter (details of verbiage aren't my point - it's the sense I'm going after), might we see $150? And if we did, does that really matter?
My point here isn't that Tesla should be ignoring the quarterly results - just that we've seen historical evidence that the company has been managing to quarter end results. I even believe that was important for the last year to show growing and improving results. I also believe that the long term success of the company includes a shift away from managing for quarter end results. That might take a year to avoid any particularly large shocks to the system, but it helps level out the system and puts it on a more sustainable basis. As an investor in the company, this is a behavior shift that I'm looking for to support the long term health of the company.
I actually don't care about quarter end focus, quarter to quarter,
this year. I'm thinking further out - I don't want to continue seeing this behavior being readily visible and apparently part of Tesla's corporate culture in several years, and I particularly don't want to see it when Gen 3 is shipping. I
believe (and recognize that I could be wrong) that the value of the quarter end focus is no longer needed (Tesla is a going concern and has other problems to tackle), and further
believe (but could be wrong) that it will be easier to start shifting away from the behavior pattern now than it will be in a few years when there are more employees, bigger company, and more time for the pattern of behavior to become accepted as normal and reasonable.