Hey guys....
Here is an article from CNBC.. Phil LeBeau.... typical crap article...
Investors giving 'cash incineration engine' Tesla a lot of rope, but may soon lose patience.
Phil LeBeau on Twitter
This headline is misleading in 2 respects... the people he is referring to are investors only in the broadest sense of the word, in that they are are long/short hedge fund, which is in an investment vehicle. But with regards to Tesla they are shorts. Furthermore, they're not "losing patience", they are actively betting against Tesla.
I have responded to him
andrew thomas on Twitter
Anyway... my thought is... I see this all the time... link bait headline... and in the article... they basically contradict themselves.
Here is a blog I wrote about reviews of the Chevy Bolt... where they make grand claims in the headline that the Bolt is a big problem for Tesla but then rein in the claims with disclaimers that largely contradict the headline.
The media on Tesla versus the Chevy Bolt – Andrew Thomas – Medium
Does anyone have any idea about how we could shame or tarnish the reputation of these journalists that do this? Or somehow incentivize them to report more honestly? I may start putting up more tweets like that... I am also trying to think of a good hash tag to express this idea... #linkbait #fakenews I don't know. The other problem is that by tweeting it's just drawing more attention to them. Any ideas?