You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Really depends on who sold 'em. I know *more often than not* the buyer is the one making a directional bet and the seller is a market-maker, but it could of course be the other way around, or *both* sides of the trade could be making directional bets.
Maximum-pain.com, the "options walls" say that the market makers want a Friday close above 250 and below 260. Max pain is at 250.
Have you considered that someone might be selling $1.2 million in $247 puts for the cash income, expecting them to expire? This would be... daring.
Could you still be a bad deal if you want to sell at a peak and you don't get your shares back until the price dips back to a lower number?I read Schwab's documents. You are lending to Schwab. (Schwab then lends the shares onward.) Schwab is still obligated to buy and return the shares even if the collateral is insufficient. Only if *Schwab* can't find the shares at any price, or *Schwab* goes bankrupt, do they hand you the collateral instead. They're not allowed to voluntarily default. Nor would they want to default. If they have to buy the shares back at a high price, they can claim the cost of the shares out of the account of the short-seller, and can in fact go after the short-seller's other assets (home, car, etc.), so they have a strong incentive to buy back the shares at any price and assign the cost to the short-seller.
It's a possibility -- could happen in a Crash of 1929 scenario or in a genuine "there are only X shares in the hands of longs who are willing to trade at any price and there are more shares sold short than that" short squeeze -- but is highly unlikely. There hasn't actually been a short-squeeze like that in my lifetime. Generally in a short-covering rally, as the stock price goes higher, more people are willing to sell and *eventually* the broker can find shares at some price. And it's fairly unusual for brokers to go bankrupt, too.
Shorts are trying super hard but unable to keep SP down
This had no chance of working without a drop in the general market - there are too many shorts looking to exit. Those who attempted to short earlier today should buy back this afternoon before the traditional Monday morning rise.
Jonas to be on CNBC at 5pm EST.
Was there similar sentiment, say in June 2013, when the SP was halfway in its climb from $35 to $190?
I just checked the short interest. It actually increased by about a million more shares for the first two weeks in January. Tesla Motors, Inc. (TSLA) Short InterestOne of the traders near the end claimed this whole rally was caused by short covering and nobody corrected him. I guess there's no time for learning the facts when you're making 'fastmoney'.
At least he didn't have the last word in the clip I saw.I just checked the short interest. It actually increased by about a million more shares for the first two weeks in January. Tesla Motors, Inc. (TSLA) Short Interest
That guy on fastmoney should be kicked out of the show. He is there just to blabber and fill airtime. He even interrupts others as if his opinions are superior.
Net short interest increase does not necessarily invalid that guy's theory. There's something called rolling short. Some short cover at 200, then short at 210, cover at 220, then short at 230, etc. In the meanwhile more shorts pile on as stock price gets higher and potentially more lucrative.I just checked the short interest. It actually increased by about a million more shares for the first two weeks in January. Tesla Motors, Inc. (TSLA) Short Interest
That guy on fastmoney should be kicked out of the show. He is there just to blabber and fill airtime. He even interrupts others as if his opinions are superior.