You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep, from my experience it doesnt see lines. It can only park in the median between the two parked cars. So two vehicles on each side with a large enough space in between is required for perpendicular autopark to work.
Anyone tried this on diagonal parking spots?
These are not 90 angle but have a diagonal... maybe 60 degrees.
My guess is that the diagonal parking could possibly negotiate these spots since it would be able to sense the cars on both sides and navigate between them... OTOH, it might get confused.
Yes, without the side cameras, stall parking does not work unless there are obstructions for the sensor to reference. I am of the same sentiment as yours.It doesn't seem to pick up lines at all, only cars. Since I never park next to another car unless my life depends on it, won't ever use it again unless it's to freak someone out.
Yes, without the side cameras, stall parking does not work unless there are obstructions for the sensor to reference. I am of the same sentiment as yours.
1. What happens if you try to use it in a slot that has a car on one side and a pillar on the other, I wonder.Yep, from my experience it doesn't see lines. It can only park in the median between the two parked cars. So two vehicles on each side with a large enough space in between is required for perpendicular autopark to work.
1. What happens if you try to use it in a slot that has a car on one side and a pillar on the other, I wonder.
2. If that works, and since your car knows when to stop by aligning its back end with those of the cars on either side, does it stop if the slot on the other side of the pillar is empty and it therefore has only 1 car to align its back end with?
3. If the cars on either side are not aligned with each other, which does yours use as a reference? Might it be left sticking out because it's longer than the further-out of the reference cars?
4. If the back of the slot is something solid, does the car stop a certain distance from it or does it align itself with the others - even if one of them has its bumper against the solid object (not good!).
4. If the back of the slot is something solid, does the car stop a certain distance from it or does it align itself with the others - even if one of them has its bumper against the solid object (not good!).
it does work on the left side as well..
1. has anyone tried getting the P, and then getting out of the car and having it park on its own?
2. i find it almost as easy just to perpendicular park the car myself since the backup camera is so badass.
Tried out the new perpendicular autopark, but it takes too darn long. Usually has to do it in 2 steps, and sometimes it gets "stuck" (when it goes into drive, but won't go back into reverse). Until it gets faster, I think I'll just do it myself.
It is a cool crowd pleaser though.
Because you're amortizing the drag force over a larger distance. It's exactly the same amount of wear on the tire.
Same amount of wear and tear on the tires, but not the same same amount of stress on the linkage. You could remove the linkage all together and the attempt to drive the vehicle forward will straighten the wheels without any power steering or steering input.
Argumentative much?
Bottom line is ... tires wear out faster than when wheel is turned when moving.
Bottom line is ... tires wear out faster than when wheel is turned when moving.
So which is it? Do they wear out faster with that scrubbing? MyIt's like arguing against the flat earth society.
- - - Updated - - -
and the answer is still a flat no.