Just noticed that the tesla web store now has the chademo adapter listed with the title "CHAdeMO adapter" when a week ago it was titled "Model S/X CHAdeMO adapter." Perhaps this is progress?
CHAdeMO Adapter
CHAdeMO Adapter
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
"The Model S/X CHAdeMO Adapter is not currently supported by Model 3"Perhaps this is progress?
"The Model S/X CHAdeMO Adapter is not currently supported by Model 3"
Per the description
IMO at the $0.31-0.36 / kWh here in California that Superchargers seem to be set at, Tesla is still not making any money overall once you factor in installation, maintenance and demand charges. Frankly, I still think that those prices are competitive. Best comparison would be EVgo pricing - without a monthly they charge $0.20 / minute and you can get around 45 kW so - this would work out to about $0.27 / kWh. But most of their customers are not going to charge at that rate and I'd bet that their average charge to the customer is higher than Tesla's for a significantly lower peak charging rate.Now it comes to that Tesla not releases CCS / CHAdeMO adapter with Model 3 for a reason. Try to force you to use their SC to make a profit ( or in their words to use the profit to build more SCs. What ever).
With the price hike for Tesla super chargers announced yesterday.
Now it comes to that Tesla not releases CCS / CHAdeMO adapter with Model 3 for a reason. Try to force you to use their SC to make a profit ( or in their words to use the profit to build more SCs. What ever).
Unless Elon releases those adapters before their standard battery Model 3 releases, ppl will just use their foot to vote not buying a car which does not have standard charger and forced to pay higher rate on the road for charging.
Few get CHAdeMO rates cheaper than Tesla... It's just not very "Tesla" to not support a way to plug in and charge. Tesla is one of few, if not the only one that allows customers to plug in to a variety of differing methods of chargers... (and plugs.)
I'm lucky enough to get CHAdeMO for free at the office...
IMO at the $0.31-0.36 / kWh here in California that Superchargers seem to be set at, Tesla is still not making any money overall once you factor in installation, maintenance and demand charges. Frankly, I still think that those prices are competitive. Best comparison would be EVgo pricing - without a monthly they charge $0.20 / minute and you can get around 45 kW so - this would work out to about $0.27 / kWh. But most of their customers are not going to charge at that rate and I'd bet that their average charge to the customer is higher than Tesla's for a significantly lower peak charging rate.
... We need CHAdeMO and CCS adapters!
Here is an example: my first road trip in Tesla I get down to Beaver, UT supercharger, one stall is broken, other 3 are occupied, 4 cars waiting. In another 30 miles there is a CHAdeMO/CCS charger that is available, I used it on my prior trip in 2018 LEAF, it could give me sufficient charge in 15 min to make it to my destination, cost from ChargePoint would be around $10 (or about $0.50 per kwh). I would not think twice about paying for CHAdeMO, even though I have 6 months free charging from Tesla. Just let me charge!
Tesla isnt the standard because nobody is using their plug design; what you meant is that it's the leading network, but that is going to matter a whole lot less in the future.
Make no mistake, this isn't about supercharging prices, it's about choice and I have an email I sent to Tesla back in October as proof. Every auto manufacturer has an incentive to build a charging network and if they are all building CCS, Tesla will have the smaller network over time.
In my case, there are many rural routes in BC that don't have Superchargers, but have provincial (state) CHAdeMO and CCS. I want to use those to go places and I don't want to lobby Tesla to build a supercharger where it doesn't make sense.
Lastly, with tech like this Porsche and BMW unveil EV charger that’s three times faster than Tesla’s do you think waiting for a spot is going to matter much in the future? Not every CCS will operate at these levels, but there will be enough that do. After all, CCS IS the standard after all, even Tesla is doing it in Europe which I'll add, every driver there will better off than us in North America bexsbbe they have choice.
Hope the government will do something for us. In China, any EV not comply with national GB standard will not qualify for free green license plate. In some state such as SHANGHAI , a ICE license plate could cost as much as 30K US$. So Tesla there started to provide converter cable for their GB standard and Tesla plug, and later on installed two plug one L2 and one L3 with every Tesla car sold there.
I do believe Tesla will do nothing about CCS and Chademo, and force Model 3 owner to use their SCs until one state / province / federal government in US or Canada enforce the standard by any kind of incentives.
Unfortunately, I don't see that happening in the U.S. The Federal Government doesn't like get involved and the only state I could see trying that would be California but they wouldn't have any incentive to do so as Tesla has a robust network in California and they are a California based company - it's hard enough to get companies to have major operations in CA, I doubt they will intentionally aggravate one that does. I could also see any agency trying to do that to be sued by Tesla.
Much like VHS/Beta or Blu-ray/HDDVD, it will need to be the market to convince Tesla to switch to CCS.
Sounds like this issue is mainly a southwest Canadien and maybe California issue. Haven't heard of many others in the rest of the country complaining about this.