UnknownSoldier
Unknown Member
Oh, you noticed that too?Entire article is slanted negative.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, you noticed that too?Entire article is slanted negative.
it's more the comments section is inundated with fossil fuel industry trolls. fossil fuel indiustry is well over $2.3 Trillion per _year_. rent seekers vs free sunlight and wind 1x costIt's rare for the real "prestige" newspapers to ever report on Tesla, and yet here's a wild card from The Washington Post of all things.
As Tesla races to meet Model 3 deadline, factory pressures and suspicions grow
i remember that article, it was infuriating. he’s been fair at times, and loves tesla cars. but he pounds musk and tesla as a company. kinda leaning towards “thumbs down” for him ( i guess the emoji didn’t work the first time)Business Insider is a click-house located in a circus tent.
A couple years ago Matthew DeBord was loaned a P90D, which he used to take his family on a camping trip.
Pictures have all been deleted, presumably to protect the innocent (his family) from the stupidity (his).
- He deliberately didn't charge the car fully.
- He ignored the warnings to charge.
- And then he nearly ran out of gas ... er, electricity (as he put it), and stranded his family while he waited for a 120V to trickle charge.
- Also .. no mention of the P90D's performance.
We took a Tesla Model S on a road trip and learned the hard way how it's different from every other car
Business Insider is a click-house located in a circus tent.
A couple years ago Matthew DeBord was loaned a P90D, which he used to take his family on a camping trip.
Pictures have all been deleted, presumably to protect the innocent (his family) from the stupidity (his).
- He deliberately didn't charge the car fully.
- He ignored the warnings to charge.
- And then he nearly ran out of gas ... er, electricity (as he put it), and stranded his family while he waited for a 120V to trickle charge.
- Also .. no mention of the P90D's performance.
We took a Tesla Model S on a road trip and learned the hard way how it's different from every other car
Here is a fun one from MF, layoffs and the end of the Home Depot deal mean Tesla is shutting down it's solar business
Tesla's Solar Business Is in Trouble
it's more the comments section is inundated with fossil fuel industry trolls. fossil fuel indiustry is well over $2.3 Trillion per _year_. rent seekers vs free sunlight and wind 1x cost
Hopefully the local EV club will set them straight by just giving dispassionate facts as they have been around close to 40 years Electric Vehicle Association of Greater Washington, DC | Promoting electric vehicles as an environmental and energy alternative
The assembly building at Plant 2 wasn’t tall enough for the 737’s vertical stabilizer, so it had to be attached by crane in the plant’s parking lot, then rolled down to the Thompson Site (where 392 additional 737s were built). This tail attachment process continued for the first eight 737s built.
At the time, Renton was at capacity with the 707 and 727 production. After 271 aircraft, production was moved to Renton in late 1970.
It looks like during the run-up to next week, we got another Dana Hull special on Bloomberg.
The Future of Tesla Hinges on This Gigantic Tent
I wouldn't call this a hit piece. Tesla as the spearhead of the renewed economical surge around northern Nevada is "responsible" for the surge in property prices and greater economic activity. That doesn't imply that Tesla is responsible for the lack of cheaper housing options. Sparks wanted the increase in property values and now they are getting it. The negative consequences of that policy is something that is the responsibility of the city and the state to handle somehow. Certain tax breaks and credits means Tesla's gigafactory wont directly pay for that with increased tax revenue, at least yet.Here's an unusual hit piece: 'All humanity has left the area': paying for Tesla's Gigafactory
Basically blames the Gigafactory for poverty in northern Nevada.
Here's an unusual hit piece: 'All humanity has left the area': paying for Tesla's Gigafactory
Basically blames the Gigafactory for poverty in northern Nevada.
My experience with the 2015 AP1 hardware AEB system is it works very well, and might possibly have saved my life. Summer of 2017 we were way too late out of Hamburg and needed to get to Kiel in time to reach the ferry. Lots of construction on A1 or A7 (can't remember which one we actually ended up on trying to avoid crazy queues in Hamburg got us turned around), and we were really running late. Finally we get out of construction zones and into a no-speed limit of autobahn. We're doing about 180km/h (110mph) in the leftmost lane in a 3 lane autobahn stretch. The car in front is not moving away and we are way too close in an effort to get him to move to the right. Yes in hindsight that was pretty stupid. Anyway in the rightmost lane a semitruck jumps to the middle lane to pass some other semis and a car from the middle lane jumps to the leftmost one doing maybe 120-130km/h. So the car in front of me brakes hard and by the time I move my foot from the accelerator to the brake I notice that the pedal is already depressed and the car is seriously braking. Alarms and everything goes off as well of course. And beause of the help from the AEB I do manage to not rearend the car in front and I arrive safely in Kiel.So, the FUD's turning up to 11:
(This is electrek, he's reporting *on* another article)
Tesla Model S fails auto braking test, Tesla questions validity of the test
So someone paid the Luxembourg auto testing agency to do a weird, rigged test. (I'm guessing Volvo, but can't prove it.)
They tested a brand new prototype 2018 Volvo with a bunch of extra cameras and computers) and showed that it can stop for a mockup cutout with a car rear printed on it.
They then "tested" an obsolete 2015 Model S (with the Mobileye hardware) -- where the AEB is only supposed to "reduce the severity of an impact" and is NOT supposed to prevent a crash. The 2015 Model S performed as advertised, and hit the cutout at low speed, reducing the severity of the impact. They advertised this as a "failed test", without mentioning that they were using an obsolete version of the car.
They invited press for this stunt, but didn't invite Tesla.
Tesla requested the details of the test protocol and were refused.
So, the dirty tricks are getting quite serious now. I suspect Luxembourg was chosen for the bribability of their auto testing agency, since this is obviously a rigged test.
So someone paid the Luxembourg auto testing agency to do a weird, rigged test. (I'm guessing Volvo, but can't prove it.)