Somebody on twitter was arguing the second point using the justification that sometimes DC chargers are in paid carparks so you should be able to tie up the charger for as long as you have paid to park while you wander around the city or go to work. Which is not strictly wrong, but incredibly selfish and inconsiderate (especially when those same people probably also would complain about not enough chargers). Just be ready to go back and move the car to another spot after 30-40 minutes or so.
Idle fees will very quickly put an end to that sort of rubbish, which is why I am a big fan of them.
It’s like politicians arguing what they did was perfectly ”legal”. OK, but what you did was inconsiderate, selfish, or unethical. Just because the law doesn’t stop you from doing something doesn’t mean you should. For people who have that mindset, think about the impact your behaviour has on others for once!
Evie had a customer survey a couple of weeks ago. I encouraged them to implement idle fees (they used to have per-minute fees as well as per kWh, which are not quite the same, since those fees applied for the entire session and penalised EVs with lower maximum charging rates). I think per-minute fees should be adopted to charge over 90%, not just when you reach 100%. If you really really need to charge above 90% then you’d suck it up or move your car to an AC charger. It you don’t need to charge past 90%, its a great incentive to disconnect.