In the past day or so, I've been thinking about this and I'm reasonably convinced that tracking cases to gauge the inflection point and determine when we have a handle on SARS-CoV-2 spread is not really providing us as much information as we hope. I'm not advocating we stop, just that the data is very misleading if you are trying to make policy decisions from it. The reason I think this is that we see everyone using different protocols to determine testing criteria. Some hospitals won't test unless you are sick enough to be admitted, a few are testing anyone that drives up and asks. This leaves a very incomplete picture.
Don't get me wrong, we still need to do the testing, but here is what made me think that:
United States Coronavirus: 68,802 Cases and 1,037 Deaths - Worldometer
Because deaths lag cases by 2-3 weeks, and we have a reasonable estimate of the Case Fatality Rate (2-3%) and the Infection Fatality Rate (0.5-1%), when you look at the above state by state, it is clear that the number of cases is grossly under-reported compared to the number of deaths.
Let's take NY and WA states as examples. We know NY has done a lot of surveillance, more than probably any other state. At the time of this writing, that is 366 deaths, 33,013 cases. Now, I am making an assumption here that NY and WA had SARS-CoV-2 introduced into the population by travelers at approximately the same time. WA state shows 132 deaths, but only 2,588 cases.
Because cases lag deaths by, lets say, 14 days, that would mean 14 days ago the states had approximately the following number of cases (assuming a CFR of 2.5%):
14,640 - NY
5,280 - WA
Now, if you look at the US as a hole, with 1036 deaths at the time of this post, that means 2 weeks ago (assuming a CFR of 2.5%), we had 41,440 cases. That's a crap ton more than are reported.
Anyway, morning ramblings before I finish my first cup of coffee. Feel free to tear it apart if I am wrong.