AlanSubie4Life
Efficiency Obsessed Member
No active cases of COVID-19
New Zealand is supposedly free of COVID-19! Full details above. We now get to see how long it lasts...
Note that they had 22 deaths and have conducted 294,848 tests.
That's a test to death ratio of 13402. This is impressive (and is the main feature that enabled them to crush the curve).
To get similar test coverage in the US, we would need to have conducted about 1.5 billion tests by now. (That probably would have resulted in effectively eliminating the virus, and it's a shame we didn't try that strategy - we definitely could have, and we could have been done by now - it's only 70x what we have actually done, and the best part is that it would have been fantastically cheap (probably only a few hundred billion).)
(For the silly people out there who think per capita matters, this is 59k tests per million people in New Zealand, and 4.5 million tests per million people in the US...which suggests we probably could have got away with fewer than 1.5 billion tests...even just 200-300 million tests probably would have been enough since there's a lot of contact redundancy when infections are dense...)
Of course, New Zealand benefits from being an island (not sure that "zero" is really possible in the United States until there is a vaccine, and I don't expect it to stay at zero in New Zealand, either), but there's a big difference between where we are at now, and a situation with minimal/no community transmission (we could have been there, just by following the advice of public health experts, starting in early February).
I sure hope what we have is good enough! Slow burn to 200k deaths I guess is the current strategy?
New Zealand is supposedly free of COVID-19! Full details above. We now get to see how long it lasts...
Note that they had 22 deaths and have conducted 294,848 tests.
That's a test to death ratio of 13402. This is impressive (and is the main feature that enabled them to crush the curve).
To get similar test coverage in the US, we would need to have conducted about 1.5 billion tests by now. (That probably would have resulted in effectively eliminating the virus, and it's a shame we didn't try that strategy - we definitely could have, and we could have been done by now - it's only 70x what we have actually done, and the best part is that it would have been fantastically cheap (probably only a few hundred billion).)
(For the silly people out there who think per capita matters, this is 59k tests per million people in New Zealand, and 4.5 million tests per million people in the US...which suggests we probably could have got away with fewer than 1.5 billion tests...even just 200-300 million tests probably would have been enough since there's a lot of contact redundancy when infections are dense...)
Of course, New Zealand benefits from being an island (not sure that "zero" is really possible in the United States until there is a vaccine, and I don't expect it to stay at zero in New Zealand, either), but there's a big difference between where we are at now, and a situation with minimal/no community transmission (we could have been there, just by following the advice of public health experts, starting in early February).
I sure hope what we have is good enough! Slow burn to 200k deaths I guess is the current strategy?
Last edited: