so why are you advocating NEM3?Oh god NO. And I do not work for the CPUC.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
so why are you advocating NEM3?Oh god NO. And I do not work for the CPUC.
It wasn't an equivalence, it was that the average compensation for exporting a kWh to the grid under the proposal would be around $0.05/kWh. Two different things.One) where did you read this $0.05 kWh equivalence for the $8 per kW per month access charge?
That wasn't my point.Two) I agree with you that there appears no reasonable way for a solar-only household that only uses 1/9 of contemporaneously generated solar power behind the meter to make any sense of a PV install.
I am kind of shocked that even though you know that if they counted solar capacity plus battery capacity that the capacity payment would be greater than people having no system just paying retail rates yet you continue to push this idea of yours. NEM 3 is not trying to get rid of PV with ESS and you know that.
That's fair. Because in reading the proposal it seems to be more equitable, more fair.so why are you advocating NEM3?
It wasn't an equivalence, it was that the average compensation for exporting a kWh to the grid under the proposal would be around $0.05/kWh. Two different things.
That wasn't my point.
My point was that if you assume that you will use at least some of your solar behind the meter, then with the $8/kW tax, it doesn't pay to export at all. That assumes you could get a non-export agreement where you don't get the $0.05/kWh exported but don't have to pay the $8/kW tax. I.e. you'd be financially better off just throwing away the kWhs you don't need behind the meter, rather than export them . And as I don't think we've hit the point yet where the marginal kWh exported from residential solar is actually bad for the grid, that's a warped economic incentive to provide.
Cheers, Wayne
Based on those numbers I would not do solar again. My first system had a payback of about 10 years, after 10 years started having issues. Now its in need of repairs. So you finally get your money back, warranty is up, and bam something goes wrong. You are then paying PG&E for a non working, or partially working system. You can pay to fix, that will take another 3 years or so to payback. By then something else will go wrong. You will never get ahead. Roof leak? good luck, you are now never going to break even. 7k to r&r panels for repairs etc. My guess is, if you want to disconnect an old pv system, PG&E will require building permits and plans. There goes a few thousand more when you are sick of paying PG&E for a broken system. There are just too many things that can go wrong. I guess now, best bet is go to harbor freight and buy the ground mount pv system and little inverter for charging our cars ... I was hoping to move in 10 years, maybe I will need to bump that up to 5 when my grandfathering expires.Per the CPUC proposal (and using the IOU's calculator), they estimate a new housing install (one that does not get the MTC) will have this payback if the solar is sized to offset 50% or 100% of the home loads.
View attachment 744846
SCE non-CARE is looking kinda scary. As others have said, homeowners are forced by California law to put that solar system in. But with this type of ROI, who would you want to bear the cost.
This is NEM2-PS, and the generation does not include our two Powerwalls:
View attachment 744851
I guess that most of the posters here don't have more than 10kW of storage, so they aren't on NEM2-MT.
I agree that NEM1/2 is lop sided. But would you invest in a 15 yr ROI with unexpected outcomes? No one does. Most people don't stay in one home for 15 years. Prove me wrongThat's fair. Because in reading the proposal it seems to be more equitable, more fair.
It seems to me that what the CPUC is saying is WOOOOPS NEM 2.0 wow ummm it is embarrassing but we gave you all way way too good of a deal. NEM 2 systems are being paid off in 3-5 years. This is costing other ratepayers money. We need to lower this to 15 years and come up with a new plan because we as the CPUC completely botched this NEM 2.0. In lowering this to 15 years you will benefit from your system paying itself off 3-5 times over and we think that this is well a GREAT DEAL still. I agree with them. If you are under NEM 2 be happy you have a great deal even with it reduced to 15 years. If you paid 30k for your system you are going to have a paid off system and 60k in your pocket in 15 years.
This is NEM2-PS, and the generation does not include our two Powerwalls:
View attachment 744851
I guess that most of the posters here don't have more than 10kW of storage, so they aren't on NEM2-MT.
Agree, but we don't know if it would be possible to get a non-export agreement.That assumes you could get a non-export agreement where you don't get the $0.05/kWh exported but don't have to pay the $8/kW tax.
Yep. With inexpensive gas and the cost of upgrading equipment and electrical, it is just not worth it to switch over to electric appliances.My Natural gas bill ("The gas company") averages about $22-25 a month, except for dec and jan when I use my central heat. Its about $80-90 for those two months. My bill from the gas company (thats the gas utility name for those unaware) is a complete non issue for me, really. Not nearly enough for me to consider moving to electric for water heater, or my dryer (the dryer would be considerable expense, with a new line run, etc).
I have a gas dryer (no electric plug in my laundry room), but my double ovens are electric. I do have a 6 burner gas stove though, and a gas water heater.
I have have 3 powerwalls and no kw of storage.
Problem with this is, these systems will be lucky to make it 15 years with no repairs. The life of the system is rated for 25, inverter is 10-15... So with these numbers, at the end of 25 years you paid more than you saved. My system is just a tad over 10 years, I need to have 4 panels replaced. The price of the panels alone are about $300 each. Figure installation, permitting, submitting paperwork to PG&E, another 1-2k. I am sure they are also not taking into account regular cleanings, figure 200-300 a year. God forbid others also have to help pay for a clean environment. A person dishes out 20-40k on a system, currently takes about 5 years to break even. Yet, we are worried about people who pay an extra $200 a year for cleaner power. I could have taken the same money, put into my mortgage, bought another rental, put in the stock market, all of which could have an excellent return on investment. People who went solar, were trying to do something good, now we are the bad guys. Want to change it, fine don't mess with existing solar customers. Let us finish our grandfathering with what we were promised. 5 years cut off my grandfathering pretty much removes all profit for my investments.That's fair. Because in reading the proposal it seems to be more equitable, more fair.
It seems to me that what the CPUC is saying is WOOOOPS NEM 2.0 wow ummm it is embarrassing but we gave you all way way too good of a deal. NEM 2 systems are being paid off in 3-5 years. This is costing other ratepayers money. We need to lower this to 15 years and come up with a new plan because we as the CPUC completely botched this NEM 2.0. In lowering this to 15 years you will benefit from your system paying itself off 3-5 times over and we think that this is well a GREAT DEAL still. I agree with them. If you are under NEM 2 be happy you have a great deal even with it reduced to 15 years. If you paid 30k for your system you are going to have a paid off system and 60k in your pocket in 15 years.
Is the system size they use based on DC or AC?
I have a 5.98 kW DC panel system. But the micorinverters max AC output is 75% of that at 4.5 kW. They always use microinverters that have a lower voltage than the panels and then add the loss of energy when converting from DC to AC. The max my house can get at any one time under the best ideal conditions based on max microinverter output is 4.5 kW
Mentioned to show that we have 10kW or less:Wow so your batteries aren't even mentioned? Frack... 10 kW or less...
I agree NEM 2.0 incentive was too generous with the buy back pricing. They are fixing that but also now penalizing solar owners with the flat rate per kW charge. The IOU are trying to recoup lost revenue because we are using less energy. I think there is a big difference between reducing incentives and charging these fees.That's fair. Because in reading the proposal it seems to be more equitable, more fair.
It seems to me that what the CPUC is saying is WOOOOPS NEM 2.0 wow ummm it is embarrassing but we gave you all way way too good of a deal. NEM 2 systems are being paid off in 3-5 years. This is costing other ratepayers money. We need to lower this to 15 years and come up with a new plan because we as the CPUC completely botched this NEM 2.0. In lowering this to 15 years you will benefit from your system paying itself off 3-5 times over and we think that this is well a GREAT DEAL still. I agree with them. If you are under NEM 2 be happy you have a great deal even with it reduced to 15 years. If you paid 30k for your system you are going to have a paid off system and 60k in your pocket in 15 years.
Go read the report. Your results are not typical. NEM 2 is going to be changed and CPUC believes they have the right to lower NEM 2 to 15 years from 20.Problem with this is, these systems will be lucky to make it 15 years with no repairs. The life of the system is rated for 25, inverter is 10-15... So with these numbers, at the end of 25 years you paid more than you saved. My system is just a tad over 10 years, I need to have 4 panels replaced. The price of the panels alone are about $300 each. Figure installation, permitting, submitting paperwork to PG&E, another 1-2k. I am sure they are also not taking into account regular cleanings, figure 200-300 a year. God forbid others also have to help pay for a clean environment. A person dishes out 20-40k on a system, currently takes about 5 years to break even. Yet, we are worried about people who pay an extra $200 a year for cleaner power. I could have taken the same money, put into my mortgage, bought another rental, put in the stock market, all of which could have an excellent return on investment. People who went solar, were trying to do something good, now we are the bad guys. Want to change it, fine don't mess with existing solar customers. Let us finish our grandfathering with what we were promised. 5 years cut off my grandfathering pretty much removes all profit for my investments.
Have you done the math on what kind of savings you are having on your electric bills? While you might not have $60k in your pocket you might save $60k over 15 years.I agree NEM 2.0 incentive was too generous with the buy back pricing. They are fixing that but also now penalizing solar owners with the flat rate per kW charge. The IOU are trying to recoup lost revenue because we are using less energy. I think there is a big difference between reducing incentives and charging these fees.
I certainty am not going to end up with $60k in my pocket on NEM 2.0 for 15 years. I would be curious who would?
I agree NEM 2.0 incentive was too generous with the buy back pricing. They are fixing that but also now penalizing solar owners with the flat rate per kW charge. The IOU are trying to recoup lost revenue because we are using less energy. I think there is a big difference between reducing incentives and charging these fees.
I certainty am not going to end up with $60k in my pocket on NEM 2.0 for 15 years. I would be curious who would?