Ponzi scheme :
What returns does Tesla give? Cars, and a few AP features. There is no monetary shifting from new buyers to previous buyers...
I think he meant ponzu sauce.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ponzi scheme :
What returns does Tesla give? Cars, and a few AP features. There is no monetary shifting from new buyers to previous buyers...
Took the plunge, added the FSD to the AP on LR3 , I ordered it from the cars web browser. Strange thing happened upon completion of the transaction the Cars touch screen went completely blank and took a while to reboot, like over 30 seconds had a black screen. I am a bit concerned. The FSD is now listed on my cars option and my CC got dinged for the purchase.
He’s clearly being overdramatic. I doubt he truly believes Musk is running a scheme...Ponzi scheme :
What returns does Tesla give? Cars, and a few AP features. There is no monetary shifting from new buyers to previous buyers...
He’s clearly being overdramatic. I doubt he truly believes Musk is running a scheme...
Ponzi scheme :
What returns does Tesla give? Cars, and a few AP features. There is no monetary shifting from new buyers to previous buyers...
The $2k, $3k, $5k whatever was charged for FSD coming soon features is most certainly being used for production of cars/tech/salaries/costs/etc. While I'm not on the inside, I guarantee those who paid $2k or whatever, Tesla didn't park that in an interest bearing account specifically for FSD in the future, they need that cash now to fund their current operation. Ponzi schemes are great until they aren't, there's no surprise with the deposits, selling future tech, that they're raising capital today to fund development and pay today's expenses. It's all fine and dandy until it gets too crazy and the whole charade collapses. Many companies collect money via deposits to fund things, but Tesla seems to do it at the furthest extreme.
While you provided a literal translation, there still becomes a collapse when a company pulls in funds from new buyers (could be existing customer buying something new) and that shifting to build cars for other new buyers, etc. If Tesla truly struggles and has to lay off, they may layoff developers of future tech just to keep the lights on to deliver cars, they won't be in a position to refund those who pre-paid and basically this would all feel like a Ponzi scheme. Regardless, it could happen, I hope it doesn't.
Hmm, maybe that's why they had to end the referral program?What returns does Tesla give? Cars, and a few AP features. There is no monetary shifting from new buyers to previous buyers...
If it works less than 50% of the time, I think you would have a case to say it does not workIf Tesla promises audio, that doesn't automatically mean premium audio.
NOA does not mean flawless NOA. As long as it requires an attentive driver, Tesla is off the hook for providing NOA with an attentive driver.
Summon is slow speed in a very limited distance so I doubt it requires more than HW2.0
The $2k, $3k, $5k whatever was charged for FSD coming soon features is most certainly being used for production of cars/tech/salaries/costs/etc. While I'm not on the inside, I guarantee those who paid $2k or whatever, Tesla didn't park that in an interest bearing account specifically for FSD in the future, they need that cash now to fund their current operation. Ponzi schemes are great until they aren't, there's no surprise with the deposits, selling future tech, that they're raising capital today to fund development and pay today's expenses. It's all fine and dandy until it gets too crazy and the whole charade collapses. Many companies collect money via deposits to fund things, but Tesla seems to do it at the furthest extreme.
While you provided a literal translation, there still becomes a collapse when a company pulls in funds from new buyers (could be existing customer buying something new) and that shifting to build cars for other new buyers, etc. If Tesla truly struggles and has to lay off, they may layoff developers of future tech just to keep the lights on to deliver cars, they won't be in a position to refund those who pre-paid and basically this would all feel like a Ponzi scheme. Regardless, it could happen, I hope it doesn't.
Buy an actual car, then get 5 friends to also buy an actual car and we'll send you some tires for your actual car.Hmm, maybe that's why they had to end the referral program?
Buy an actual car, then get 5 friends to also buy an actual car and we'll send you some tires for your actual car.
Not seeing the link to Ponzi here, everyone got the product...
Tesla was getting sued regarding the referral program by dealer's associations, plus it was an extra cost that was no longer needed.
So here we are, almost two years later, with exactly one input-control feature released in the FSD package that isn't available to people who only have EAP. The current "FSD beta" given to social media influencers adds what is effectively Nav on Autopilot for local usage, with the rollout to those blessed and connected enough to be chosen for the Early Access Program probably coming in a month or two, and those of us who are just regular people are probably going to get the update in 5-8 months, if I had to guess.
How's everyone feeling about their FSD purchase?
Great, since I had hardware 2.5 and felt the upgrade to the faster computer was worth 2k to me, even if no other features were released. That got me the enhanced visualizations, and "whatever else, if anything" gets released. So, for me, just fine.
This is likely the wrong thread to zombie rez, though, since it was talking about a VERY specific point in time where a few of us got to upgrade for 2k from EAP.
Indeed. I'm genuinely curious how people feel about that period of time, since it's the period of time where they started to do… interesting things… with the FSD option, pricing thereof, and treatment of people who ordered it.