Just rolled into DE supercharger nearly "empty" and got a good rate...
Sig737/VIN628 so a pretty early delivery.
Excellent! About 118kW
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just rolled into DE supercharger nearly "empty" and got a good rate...
Sig737/VIN628 so a pretty early delivery.
Well, that's interesting. Looks like you're the first Sig to charge above 90 kW. Did you update your software recently by any chance?
v5.8 1.49.24 for a few weeks now...
Strange. Anything different about your car? Like was the battery pack ever replaced or anything?
Strange. Anything different about your car? Like was the battery pack ever replaced or anything?
Ah, well, that explains why you've got 120khw support with a low VIN.Main battery replaced at ~11k.
Ah, well, that explains why you've got 120khw support with a low VIN.
So...I just need my battery pack to fail
I've been following this on a number of threads. We have yet to hear from someone that tested both a low and high VIN number to confirm the difference is due to the car and not the supercharger. I.E. It may be listed as 120kW but isn't charging at that rate at that time.
Not saying it isn't hardware in the car, just saying I haven't seen confirmation of that yet.
Hmm...
Main battery replaced at ~11k.
Ugh. You had me excited for a minute. Happy for you though that you get to enjoy 120 SC.
So really guys? Tesla will add support for owners with a failed battery pack, but won't for the rest of us. I see absolutely no fairness or logic behind that model. Want retrofit.
Did your drive-train (inverter/motor) get replaced as well? Just making sure there are not two variables to deal with.Yeah...I was so excited when I saw it I completely forgot about the battery swap.
Reread what you said and that I quoted.Meaning sigs were essentially built early on before vendor agreements were finalized. Thus, things changed as expected and later vehicles are using "better" parts. They had to scramble early on and when they didn't have enough parts they just used whatever they could, including the same parts used in the prototype models.
Now would be a great time for Tesla to follow up on that Battery Replacement Plan that seems to be going the way of the sunshade. Just sayin'....Ah, well, that explains why you've got 120khw support with a low VIN.
So...I just need my battery pack to fail
Reread what you said and that I quoted.
I wasn't told my car wasn't a jetski either. That doesn't imply that my car is a jetski.
Well, the logic would be the expense. If it's in the battery pack then that'd be a big hit to Tesla for a relatively minor upgrade. I'm one of the very, very last folks to get old 90kwh support, but how minutes would I realistically save in a lifetime of typical supercharging use? At some point, I can understand if the retrofit cost isn't worth the karmic cost of leaving older cars out of the 120kwh party, even if I'm one of those folks left out.I see absolutely no fairness or logic behind that model. Want retrofit.