neroden
Model S Owner and Frustrated Tesla Fan
That's my main issue, yeah.Assuming Tesla isn't really taking away our beloved combined speedometer / power meter,
But why make something that's essentially "perfect" (6.2) and screw it all up and move things off the main screen that are really quite unobtrusive (time/temp/date, etc) and used all the time?
I'm pretty sure a very talented a GRAPHIC designer designed this layout, and not a USER INTERFACE designer. You really need both.
All I can say is I really hope this is far from production ready. If it's not (i.e. close to production), I, for one, won't upgrade past 6.2 until this is fixed. The end result is such that Tesla is screwing users out of any other new FUNCTIONAL features (Nav, drive unit, etc) that may be released just because of this crippled IC user interface.
Everything HankLloydRight said, too. The "status line" is very useful; I routinely check the time, the temperature, the odometer.
As leaked, this is a serious downgrade in functionality. Tesla should restore:
(1) our beloved right-of-center power meter with the "green" and "orange" and the dotted line showing regen limits and power limits. Removing this is totally unacceptable.
The replacement not only obnoxiously takes up an entire slot -- it is also actively distracting, showing the energy graph more prominenently than the crucial kilowatt meter. The power meter is something I use all the time when driving, so I can tell whether I'm hitting regen or power limits, and see whether I'm coasting, etc. etc. This is important for safe driving on slippery roads. Anything which makes it less easy to read is incredibly obnxoxious.
(2) the extremely-well-designed status line.
I don't know who designed the original UI, but they were clearly substantially more competent than whoever designed this one. This one seems like it was designed by someone who never drove the car.
The only car which gets downgraded after you buy it -- not an ad Tesla wants to run. *Never remove functionality in an update*.
Everything JST said, too.My issue is that they appear to have removed a bunch of information in pursuit of a simpler look. Look, e.g., at the energy graph in post 73; it gives you an average and a graph but the scale on the graph is gone and the graph itself appears more compressed.
Time, date, and temp are key pieces of info I use all the time. No reason to have those only available on the main screen, especially if there's a vast empty slab of black on the screen in front of the driver.
I also can't emphasize enough how dumb the toy car display is. Even on AP vehicles, WTF is the point? You shouldn't be watching the display, even while on AP; you should be watching the road. If the point is that you should be comparing the vehicles shown on the display to the ones shown on the road to make sure the AP is seeing everything it should...well, that's just dumb. That increases driver workload, rather than decreasing it.
This was not designed by competent people. The "flat look" is not the issue (I couldn't care less) -- the removal of information is the issue. A "flat look" version of the same layout we currently have would be OK. This "get rid of useful information" layout is not OK.
If the useful information, such as the absolutely vital power meter on the center display, can be turned back on in the options, that would be OK. But so far, it doesn't look like it.
Last edited: