theslimshadyist
Active Member
Interesting, that would explain it. Maybe 17.5.36 is for EAP only right now...
I have an AP2 car with EAP and I'm still stuck on 17.5.28.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Interesting, that would explain it. Maybe 17.5.36 is for EAP only right now...
I have an AP2 car with EAP and I'm still stuck on 17.5.28.
Does any know if the new updates can be triggered from the app?
Sit back and relax. Based on current progress I expect parity around mid year.
Anyone know if this is the same message for non-P models? According to the mobile app, my 70D is on 17.6.15 as well.
I had the car in for service last week for the 2nd annual/25k mile checkup. I don't recall what firmware version I was on before I brought it in for service, but the work order said they updated the firmware to the latest version (I'm assuming to what it is now at v 17.6.15) and I thought that the 'software performance reductions' were only isolated to Performance versions of the S and X, so I'm curious to see what the message would be for a non-P model.
Did not know I could do that, thank you!
You're braver then me placing a year on it!Correct, mid year 2018
I don't think you'll see anything like this appear. Tesla is putting all of it's efforts into making full autonomy a reality. Facilitating a smoother interaction between driver assist and the driver is irrelevant to that. Perhaps if their goal was to make a great driver assist, but it isn't.I'd go a little further: I'd like to see a selectable offset for those times in the rain when on a heavily worn road where water ponds in the valleys of the lane. Would reduce the chance of hydroplaning.
I don't think you'll see anything like this appear.
Regardless, talk about selectable offsets and such is a pipe dream. Won't happen. It's not on the path to full autonomy.The goal, I'm sure, is to make it as safe as possible. If full autonomy means, where traffic conditions allow, ignoring the fact that moving over to ride the crown and lane markings to reduce the effects of hydroplaning makes the car safer than a human driver, it's missing the mark. IMHO.
The AP Learning system compares how a human driver would take a curve (off of autopilot) and modulates the speed on AP. Whenever the driver disables autopilot, a flag is made and the human driver statistics are compared to how the computer would take the curve, and it adjusted.Any ideas on what input the TACC (EAP 17.5.28) uses to determine the speed reduction when taking a tight curve? I've used it several times taking an entrance ramp to the highway and it always reduces to around the same speed, except for this morning when it took the curve about 10mph slower. The only difference was the roadway was a little slicker due to overnight rains. It leads me to theorize that the traction control sensors are at least one source of input. Does the car have accelerometer sensors that vector lateral movement?
Thanks, but just to be clear I wasn't using autosteer, just the TACC. For the record, I take that curve a lot faster than the TACC modulates, so it must not have "learned" that yet.The AP Learning system compares how a human driver would take a curve (off of autopilot) and modulates the speed on AP. Whenever the driver disables autopilot, a flag is made and the human driver statistics are compared to how the computer would take the curve, and it adjusted.
Thanks, but just to be clear I wasn't using autosteer, just the TACC. For the record, I take that curve a lot faster than the TACC modulates, so it must not have "learned" that yet.