tivoboy
Active Member
Arghh..Honestly, why do we EVEN try.. I can see that there IS an improvement in smoothness..in SOME ways it IS a bit more like a human driver.. but in many other ways its WORSE than 11.3 or whatever it was before and there have been some new introductions of deficiency or regression to once again make it near unusable end to end other than for testing purposes..5 OG. 5/2018 M3 RWD LR. 30K MILES. Nor cal. Installed last night.
It’s once again, 1 step forward two back for me at least.. I was going to call it two steps forward two steps back, but I guess based on expectations, I need to indicate backwards at least from a usability, SAFETY and any directional move toward readiness. I don’t really even have the motivation to write it all up at the moment, I’m sort of annoyed.
If the 1.1 mile 3rd test drive I did from downtown to home were any example for a STUDENT DRIVER test, the proctor would have failed them THREE times.. should that be some sort of way to judge FSDb at this point… over under vs. a student driver? I know a few YEARS ago, I said it was more like a student driver OR an inebriated driver more than anything else. We REALLY have to get past at least that minimum bar to start to believe that this is achievable.
Last edited: