Normally yes, but not when the asset backing the financial debt is at the verge of obsolescense.
I stand behind my analysis and post. You are welcome to respond, which you did, but I don't see a point in going back and forth for pages.
I believe that, and I don't see a point to that either... it's a balance, I pointed out a couple of times over the past year where I thought TT007's analyses were way off the mark, but, I never probed it beyond a post or two, because I didn't want to feel argumentative to him. I still don't want to feel argumentative to you or the rest of the board, but, now, I'm balancing that with the consequences for many people here of our not probing ideas presented here that we think don't add up.