You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is TeslaQuila a play on $TSLAQ? It’s something that Smiegel guy has on every tweet. I have no idea what it means.
After reviewing some of her recent twits, I think Dana Hull probably has a financial interest on TSLA's drop. Seems obvious to me. Not at the "they can taste blood in their mouths" level yet. Maybe she is joining the group?Is TeslaQuila a play on $TSLAQ? It’s something that Smiegel guy has on every tweet. I have no idea what it means.
BTW, if anyone still has any doubts if Dana Hull has an anti Tesla bias
Dana Hull on Twitter
After reviewing some of her recent twits, I think Dana Hull probably has a financial interest on TSLA's drop. Seems obvious to me. Not at the "they can taste blood in their mouths" level yet. Maybe she is joining the group?
I thought they already stated it was 81% in favor early last week.
err81% of shares voted, 73% of potential votes ( non-Musk family owned shares)
Yes, it's criticism. But it is critical about Tesla making a public release instead of being critical about withholding information or refusing to help investigators. But it certainly won't help the stock price.From article:
Sounds like criticism to me.
I think we’re heading in a very constructive direction here : ) !
I think when we (acting as “jurors” in the terms of Tim Urban’s excellent 2 minute video below) perceive with high confidence that this sort of intellectually dishonest posting has been made (someone is posting in the manner of an “attorney” or “witch doctor” in the terms of the video), the disagree button hit 50+ times, ie, a disagree count obviously way beyond a typical post, with no written response, is likely an improved response (communicates well with very little time spent and no clogging up the threads with futile attempts at intellectual engagement).
If someone new to the forum can’t understand what is going on,
- they can ask, and we can explain, that when in our opinion as “jurors” someone is here simply making posts here in the role of an “attorney and/or witchdoctor” rather than for a facts and reason based exchange, hitting disagree and leaving it at that is all we have time for
and/or
- we can place in our signatures comments that express this idea... ie, “I mark “disagree” and give no further time to comments I deem to be intellectually dishonest”
Here is that outstanding two minute video from Tim Urban. If you are not familiar with Tim, Elon Musk was so impressed by Tim’s long form article website, Elon invited Tim to Tesla and SpaceX to be interviewed by him.
A good article summarizing why the M3 production ramp is exceptionally good.. Finally an analysis that is based on facts.
Worth reading.....
"Fact — 9 months after start of the assembly line, GM had produced about a 1,000 Bolts.
Fact — 9 months after start of the assembly line, Tesla had produced about 10,000 Model 3."
Tesla PR Disaster 10 Times As Good As Chevy Bolt Ramp Up | CleanTechnica