-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
- Status
Zhelko Dimic
Careful bull
Evo magazine liked the car, so it will appeal to car-enthusiasts. That's the only car magazine i still read, reference material if one truly cares about driving. So for enthusiast that can live with range limitations, this is a decent choice. It doesn't have to be better in many categories...
A car enthusiast would get a Model 3 AWD (same interior size) over an I-Pace every single time, unless they want to make a ton of trade offs for the hatch.
I saw somewhere mentioned ~2 trillion dollars on S&P index funds. I think 2~3T makes sense. I would be surprised if the purchase from index funds doesn't amount to 10~15% of Tesla's shares. Take a snap of it's shareholder composition and size, then compare it with the updated shareholder lists, quarter by quarter. This would be a fun exercise.
That PoS article selectively only quotes one paragraph, leaves out the rest. It did not even give a link to Tesla's response
Guardian is pro union and anything that comes in the way of unions is fair game from their perspective. Sad.
jokes aside, can WSJ get investigated by SEC and and potentially get capped? this is class A total BS.
"Tesla's CEO tweets, stock tumbles" has 0 mention of tweets in it! amazing
i only clicked because someone i know was asking me about wtf is up with tesla and sourced this article.They weren't investigated for making libelous accusations of murder with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. As Vince Foster wrote, "The WSJ editors lie without consequence". They're criminals but nobody's willing to prosecute them.
Model 3 VINs on Twitter somewhat unnoticed in all this is that we are past 75K VINs
I hear the shorts claiming there is a demand problem because Telstar has increased their interior options from 1 to 2 on the second of their three Model 3 variants
The horror, the horror
The horror, the horror
Did you write a letter to the editor explaining your reason? Your cancellation would send the clearest signal to any publication that their ad revenue isn't the only thing at stack with their shenanigans.
I did write a longer mail today to FAZ a major German newspaper regarded as highly conservative and anti Fake News asking to stop writing about any article WSJ publishes around Tesla as they are evidentially false. Have given them prove and only can hope that they return back to decent reporting about Tesla.
The more of us doing that and claiming we only come back as a subscriber if they return to decent work the more likely it is it makes a difference.
@Oil4AsphaultOnly
Good idea. I wrote sth in the box during cancellation. Will address the editor directly and try to avoid swear words.
Good idea. I wrote sth in the box during cancellation. Will address the editor directly and try to avoid swear words.
Today marks the one year anniversary of the expiry of the infamous '6 months definitely' promise with regards to the first full self driving features. Yes, that tweet was 18 months ago.
Well, anyone who knew the technology (which apparently doesn't even include all the people working on it) knew that full self-driving was a very long way away. This is one case in which Elon's optimism was not grounded in reality, and I said so well in advance.
Many scientists have predicted that fusion energy would power the world in 20 years. Many 20 years have past. So that makes them all lyers?
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
- Article
