mmd
Active Member
All what I can say to you is that if you have read Karens mail carefully all arguments you brought up have no basis. Have you read it at all?
Oh yes, I did! The problem with such analysis is an over reliance on management projections, and not fact checking these with realities. Most likely these analysts (or poster in this case) have no experience in analyzing auto sector. Just take a look at the college kids becoming Tesla auto analysts and showing up on TV for some face time.
For example, how likely is it that Model 3 will hit 25% gross margin (the conflated definition that Tesla uses)? Their luxury line up hover between 18-25%, and was down to ~14% (may be slightly higher, as Model 3 margin was negative) last Q in a push to sell more cars. It is simple economics. You can't reach higher volumes without some price concessions or further product improvements in a saturated market.
The notion that rising revenue guarantees rising profits can be wrong. Please see Tesla's own comp here. Margins got compressed as they increased revenues.
The addition of Solarcity losses (in the full picture, not in auto margin) doesn't help either.
Last edited: