Sawyer8888
Member
I'm not sure this repair is as bad as most everyone thinks. The hood and windshield need to be removed, the small area around the crack needs to cut out, a patch can be made out of a new panel (98% wasted) and butted welded in. It should be nearly structurally identical to a new car and you might lose some sound deadening material in the process. The car should be devalued by about half of the cost of the repair.
This is a good picture of the that part of the unibody. Photo Gallery | Car and Driver
This is a good observation, however it is secondary to what I believe is the issue at hand.
The point is that a relatively major body repair is needed on a brand new vehicle due to a manufacturer's error. Whether it be a $20K car or a $2M car, the individual making the purchase should not have to settle for this negligence and be required to accept a repaired vehicle.
Could the option be given to take the lease once the repair is complete, along with the full value reduction included? (Not just reducing the value by half the cost of the work, but by the true value after major body work on a luxury vehicle) Sure, seems fair. However paying full price for any refurbished product is unacceptable.
Last edited: