@HMARTINPT, you could try talking to a different service center and see if they are more helpful. I recommend describing the issue in a simpler way. You have 209 miles rated range at 100% instead of 267 miles when new. That means you have 209/267= 78% capacity left. Your mileage is 239,000. The average S/X battery capacity at this mileage is 90%. Your degradation is more than twice the average.
The number of charge cycles causes a certain amount of degradation that can't be avoided. The more cycles the more degradation. That's normal. However, some batteries degrade more on top of that. The most important factor that would cause additional degradation is the amount of time the battery spends close to 0% and 100%. Let's say overnight you have set it to 100% because you have a trip tomorrow. The battery reached 100% at 3 am and you drove off at 9 am. That means the battery was subject to parasitic chemical reactions for 6 hours. Doing this regularly is a guaranteed way to ruin the battery. In comparison, Supercharging to 100% regularly is not an issue because you drive off after Supercharging.
Similarly, arriving at your destination with close to 0% and plugging-in to a 110V outlet would be bad because the battery would spend more time close to 0%. If you do this regularly, those hours would add up over time and it would ruin the battery. However, if you arrive with 0% and you plug-in to a NEMA 14-50 outlet, that's not an issue. The total number of hours the battery spends close to 100% or 0% in its lifetime is what determines the additional degradation.
If Tesla replaces this battery, you might want to consider selling this car and switching to another Tesla with more range so you can avoid getting close to 100% and 0% regularly if that's an issue. Check out the range table here.
Not to be rude but this smells a bit to me. The only posts this user has ever made are in this thread. I realize it's early but where are the technical details? (Like CAN bus.) Where are some pictures? Why the pretty family picture? (Okay, maybe you are just proud.) Could we still have shorts trying to manipulate the stock? Guess the number of manipulative posts in this anonymous setting leaves one a bit jaded.
OP, will you please clarify something for me. You indicated that the car charged to 309 miles. You also indicated that you charge to 85% to 90%. Was the 309 mile range shown on the car at an 85-90% charge, or did you charge to 100% to get a 209 mile range indication on the car.
I ask because I charge to 89% on my 2013 P85, which gives me a range of 227-229 miles indication on my car.
Also, the range indication is based upon an assumed speed of 55mph on 2012 and 2013 model S cars. The faster you drive the more energy you use and hence the shorter your range. Headwinds, rain, snow, cold temperatures also reduce the range of the battery. Your energy usage of 360 Wh/mi is very high.
I changed my profile picture to the screen shot of my Tesla when we broke down just to verify we only had 139 miles when the battery failed. I put my family picture up because I am not a shamed to put a face to the legitimate complaint I have against Tesla. My wife's biggest fear with Tesla is breaking down on the side of the road like we did. I am sure the majority of people would understand why you wouldn't want that to happen to your family. I did use to have stock in the company until I had 3 different occasions when my power train failed and Elon's picture of "bankrupt" didn't help his cause there. Once again I am just trying to let others know what we are dealing with and how Tesla is handling it.Not to be rude but this smells a bit to me. The only posts this user has ever made are in this thread. I realize it's early but where are the technical details? (Like CAN bus.) Where are some pictures? Why the pretty family picture? (Okay, maybe you are just proud.) Could we still have shorts trying to manipulate the stock? Guess the number of manipulative posts in this anonymous setting leaves one a bit jaded.