You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm not sure how you came up with that number. Tesla has said that they are going to double the number of Superchargers, i.e. stalls, in 2017; not that they are going to double the number of Supercharger Stations/locations.
Did you look at the rollout map that Tesla just released???? It shows 17 new locations, not extra stalls in existing locations, but 17 new locations in the Bay Area alone. Each one of them says "Target opening by end of 2017". There are only 5 locations now. An additional 17 locations by end of 2017 plus whatever extra stalls they're going to add to existing locations? I sure hope it's true but not seeing it.
I should note, not all of them say "Target opening by end of 2017", only 279 sites say that. 66 sites sayLooking at @stopcrazypp numbers from his 'webfu', we are adding 346 sites in 2017. Now, I'm using my spreadsheet for a hypothetical ramp (disregard my earlier June-December numbers... sum doesn't add):
YTD 16
May 14
June 22
July 38
August 45
September 52
October 60
November 80
December 30
-----------
Total 357 (ish)
I should note, not all of them say "Target opening by end of 2017", only 279 sites say that. 66 sites say
"Target opening date to be confirmed". And there is 1 site at Mountain View, CA that says nothing.
Permits have been found by members here scouting them out. Since there are many California Superchargers already, it has become more difficult to look at a map and guess where the next one will be. I think the permit detectives have slowed down for this reason. There have been times new Superchargers have started construction before anyone noticed the permits.No new permits or construction in CA since the announcement. Permits need to start showing up for CA several per day if they're going to reach their stated goals.
Permits have been found by members here scouting them out. Since there are many California Superchargers already, it has become more difficult to look at a map and guess where the next one will be. I think the permit detectives have slowed down for this reason. There have been times new Superchargers have started construction before anyone noticed the permits.
If there announced plan was anything close to reality, we'd already see a *MASSIVE* spike in permits and construction activity before now to even have a chance at opening that many new locations in the next 8 months.
Is it possible that Tesla will be changing to a more pre-built system, building them in a factory and shipping modules to the site? They built the temporary units in the past -- maybe they have a more aesthetically pleasing design that will meet the approval of business owners. Then it is a matter of having the utility place the transformer and an electrician to hook it up. Permitting would be a mechanical permit (more like placing an air conditioning unit) rather than a building permit. No excavation, no building contractors, no weather issues, increased reliability. If they need more capacity, drop in another unit.
Infrastructure isn't a big deal. The sites aren't out in the middle of the barren Sahara. They are on highways. The lines are there. There's a lot of room in the grid.
Permitting probably takes 21-30 days with most municipalities. Some will happen in 2 weeks, other pains in the butt will take 8.
Construction seems to take 6-12 weeks (just by my off the cuff reckoning from other threads).
Considering that, Tesla has until the end of the Summer to get the sites, crews, and equipment lined up. Yeah, that's pretty ambitious when you're talking about a few hundred sites. Only a handful of which are underway.
In any case, I'm not look for the world to become utopia by New Year's Eve. I'm mighty happy to see that Tesla is working on it, though. Whether it's the end of 2017 or a bit thereafter, bring it on.
Yes, but why would you think that the percentage use of superchargers would be any less among Model 3 owners? Are they less likely to go on long trips as Model S or X owners? I don't understand why you think it's not linear. Double the number of cars and you double the number of supercharging sessions, assuming the same percentage of charging done at superchargers as we have now (about 10% of miles driven is what Tesla said a year or two ago). In fact as the supercharger network has been built out over the last year, some trips that weren't practical before are practical now, so there may be even more trips taken instead of using the ICE.Lastly, although I have not seen it mentioned here yet, I suspect some are thinking that if Tesla were to double or triple the number of cars on the road by end of 2017 or 2018 due to M3 production, it does not mean there needs double or triple the number of charging stations. It is not a linear equation. Several variables affect that calculation. The main one being that a substantial portion of owners charge at home and commute rather than going to SC stalls unless they go on long trips.
Yes, but why would you think that the percentage use of superchargers would be any less among Model 3 owners?
Yes, but why would you think that the percentage use of superchargers would be any less among Model 3 owners? Are they less likely to go on long trips as Model S or X owners? I don't understand why you think it's not linear. Double the number of cars and you double the number of supercharging sessions, assuming the same percentage of charging done at superchargers as we have now (about 10% of miles driven is what Tesla said a year or two ago). In fact as the supercharger network has been built out over the last year, some trips that weren't practical before are practical now, so there may be even more trips taken instead of using the ICE.
What's Winter?You seriously expect them to have built them in the winter?
I count 4 openings this week (Monroe WA, Arlington TX, El Paso TX, Aix-en-Provence - Val de l'Arc France)
Thank you kindly.