CuriousG
Active Member
On top of that person limits what can be seen in their profile + relatively new user = most likely a shill.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not trying to nitpick, I just wanted to check. Was this actually a VW e-Up fire?Well, to start off, the Model S definitely isn't the worst when it comes to fires. For instance, the Renault Kangoos with NiCad batteries have regularly been going up in flames for years. Probably something like 80% of the BEV fires here in Norway have been the Kangoos.
Now, when it comes to modern li-ion BEVs, the Model S ranks pretty high on the number of fires. There are three important reasons for this. One, the Model S is the second most sold BEV in the world. With more cars on the road, there will be more fires. Two, Tesla has placed the battery at the bottom of the car, for best utilization of the space, and a low center of gravity. The BMW i3 is the only other BEV with this today. With a more exposed pack, damage is more likely. Tree, Tesla uses the most energy dense batteries on the market, NCA. This is choice that's not without compromises - the batteries are more prone to fire than the chosen battery tech of the other car companies. (This has most significance in the event of damage to the battery pack.)
There's also some other smaller reasons why the Model S is more likely to catch fire. The Model S is the only BEV that can output 500 kW and charge at 130 kW. More power means more heat, more heat mens greater risk of fire. Tesla is also really trying to push the limits when it comes to compactness of the drivetrain. Less room means greater risk of fire.
Now, the Model S definitely isn't the only li-ion BEV that's caught fire. Here's an i-MiEV after it was hit by a train:
You get more residual radiation from coal ash than from a nuclear power plant.Don't this electric fire has anything to do with the fact that in France about 75% of the electricity is produced from radio active nuclear plants?
The Leaf has the battery on the bottom also.Well, to start off, the Model S definitely isn't the worst when it comes to fires. For instance, the Renault Kangoos with NiCad batteries have regularly been going up in flames for years. Probably something like 80% of the BEV fires here in Norway have been the Kangoos.
Now, when it comes to modern li-ion BEVs, the Model S ranks pretty high on the number of fires. There are three important reasons for this. One, the Model S is the second most sold BEV in the world. With more cars on the road, there will be more fires. Two, Tesla has placed the battery at the bottom of the car, for best utilization of the space, and a low center of gravity. The BMW i3 is the only other BEV with this today. With a more exposed pack, damage is more likely. Tree, Tesla uses the most energy dense batteries on the market, NCA. This is choice that's not without compromises - the batteries are more prone to fire than the chosen battery tech of the other car companies. (This has most significance in the event of damage to the battery pack.)
There's also some other smaller reasons why the Model S is more likely to catch fire. The Model S is the only BEV that can output 500 kW and charge at 130 kW. More power means more heat, more heat mens greater risk of fire. Tesla is also really trying to push the limits when it comes to compactness of the drivetrain. Less room means greater risk of fire.
Now, the Model S definitely isn't the only li-ion BEV that's caught fire. Here's an i-MiEV after it was hit by a train:
I will just leave this screen shot of one earlier my posts here, as a Friday humor
View attachment 190737
Sorry, you're absolutely right. It was an e-Up!Not trying to nitpick, I just wanted to check. Was this actually a VW e-Up fire?
http://touch.moss-avis.no/nyheter/rade/jernbaneverket/christopher-lurte-doden-igjen/s/5-67-193647
Probably something relating to the front DU.Bad electrical connection blamed for Tesla Model S fire in France
The article seems to blame on the danger of employing human workers' inconsistency in manual work as opposed to reliable repetitive robotic consistency:
“the fire was caused by a bolted electrical connection that had been improperly tightened.
Usually, these electrical connections are installed by a robot, but for this car this connection was installed manually."
Probably something relating to the front DU.
I know Elon has said that the Model S doesn't really have a front firewall. Anyone know if this is different on the D's?
The pictures here show that at least the inverter output cables are connected to the motor unit using bolts
Bad electrical connection blamed for Tesla Model S fire in France
The article seems to blame on the danger of employing human workers' inconsistency in manual work as opposed to reliable repetitive robotic consistency:
“the fire was caused by a bolted electrical connection that had been improperly tightened.
Usually, these electrical connections are installed by a robot, but for this car this connection was installed manually."
From the article: "It is important to note that while electric vehicle fires are widely reported, there’s no evidence that there are any more frequent than gas-powered car fires."
In fact, there is evidence that they are less frequent:
"The nationwide driving statistics make this very clear: there are 150,000 car fires per year according to the National Fire Protection Association, and Americans drive about 3 trillion miles per year according to the Department of Transportation. That equates to 1 vehicle fire for every 20 million miles driven, compared to 1 fire in over 100 million miles for Tesla. This means you are 5 times more likely to experience a fire in a conventional gasoline car than a Tesla!
For consumers concerned about fire risk, there should be absolutely zero doubt that it is safer to power a car with a battery than a large tank of highly flammable liquid.
— Elon"