ElectricIAC
Good-Natured Rascal
If the rest of the gear is similarly under powered or overloaded though?The MCU isn't involved in AP/FSD operation, other than displaying the visualizations.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If the rest of the gear is similarly under powered or overloaded though?The MCU isn't involved in AP/FSD operation, other than displaying the visualizations.
Don't even for a moment spend anytime reading that guy's tweets or articles. He is one of those Tesla haters spewing FUD and lies about Tesla for many years. He is the scumbag that started a "Tesla death watch" website in 2013 with a prediction that Tesla will go bankrupt soon, and worked really hard to achieve that by writing many articles that were total lies and exaggerations.Yep. You're correct.
There's a lot of research about how "vision only" systems perform at night, in different kinds of weather, etc. It's just not as good...and in some situations, quite a bit worse. For example, at night in the presence of pedestrians, vision-only systems do reaaaaallly poorly.
Edward Niedermeyer knows a lot of the researchers and tweets good links to peer-reviewed research articles and study results about this from time to time.
From what Tesla has said going to raw photon counts actually reduced the load on the FSD computer. (And removed latency in the process.)If the rest of the gear is similarly under powered or overloaded though?
Please let us know how it goes, especially in adverse conditions. Also, whether turning the AP/FSD on forces auto high beam and auto wipers.2022.20.9 got installed on my 2019 MX yesterday. Haven't had the opportunity to engage Autopilot or FSD yet. My MY 2020 with radar is still running 2022.20.8 so i expect the update will arrive soon.
What is “raw photon counts”? I am familiar with the concept in quantum physics but struggling to find the application to the current discussion.From what Tesla has said going to raw photon counts actually reduced the load on the FSD computer. (And removed latency in the process.)
It is what has been talked about ni this thread starting at this post. There are some more details, and link to a video where it was discussed, in this thread: FSD AP improvements in upcoming v11 from Lex Fridman interviewWhat is “raw photon counts”? I am familiar with the concept in quantum physics but struggling to find the application to the current discussion.
Tesla says that, but having used both systems (and being in FSD beta for both), would say the radar based system was far more reliable. Less phantom braking, and when following cars, the radar based system was much more responsive to cars slowing down and delivering a gradual deceleration. The vision only based system has a disconcerting lag time.No. Tesla has said that Tesla Vision is safer, and radar only added noise. For example it detects and slows for a Semi that is stopped partially in the lane earlier than radar does. (You know like all the firetrucks that a Tesla has slammed into the back of.) It also has fewer problems with detecting stationary objects that can trigger a false AEB event. (Though it seems that Tesla Vision has, or had, its own problems with false slowdowns/AEB events.)
Which system has rammed into the back of firetrucks and, other vehicles partially in the lane, more? (Hint: it is the radar based system.)Tesla says that, but having used both systems (and being in FSD beta for both), would say the radar based system was far more reliable. Less phantom braking, and when following cars, the radar based system was much more responsive to cars slowing down and delivering a gradual deceleration. The vision only based system has a disconcerting lag time.
Exactly! Given Tesla past performance with FW update, my level of trust is pretty low. Additionally, if someone goes against the prevailing logic and practice (radar + camera) they should provide more details aside from “trust me, it is better”.I guess we will have to wait for more vision only cars and many more drivers on the road to reach any reasonable conclusion on the impact of radar removal and switching to vision only.
Ah, that is where the “photon count” BS startedIt is what has been talked about ni this thread starting at this post. There are some more details, and link to a video where it was discussed, in this thread: FSD AP improvements in upcoming v11 from Lex Fridman interview
You can turn it off every time you enable AP.If I am on autopilot, can I turn high beam to low beam and still stay on AP or will it disengage if I do that? Any help is appreciate.
Wait for what? Tesla stopped including radars in cars for a year now. I have had both versions and can’t see the difference. Not perfect but same.I guess we will have to wait for more vision only cars and many more drivers on the road to reach any reasonable conclusion on the impact of radar removal and switching to vision only.
So just move the stalk to low beam or do I have to go into the screen submenu to do that?You can turn it off every time you enable AP.
A sub-menu pops up when you enable AP if you are fast enough.So just move the stalk to low beam or do I have to go into the screen submenu to do that?
Left stalk just push forward and it disables.So just move the stalk to low beam or do I have to go into the screen submenu to do that?
Do you need to do that _every_ time you enable AP/FSD?Left stalk just push forward and it disables.
I’m not sure it’s only “at night”. I was on a state highway in northern WI today at 8:30am (state highway 70 in Burnett County). They apparently either chip sealed with large aggregate or the top coat of asphalt had lots of voids. My 2022 vision only car kept slowing from 60 to 35 (55mph speed limit, getting passed often at max speed) due to “limited vision” from reflected glare from water “in” the road surface.Yep. You're correct.
There's a lot of research about how "vision only" systems perform at night, in different kinds of weather, etc. It's just not as good...and in some situations, quite a bit worse. For example, at night in the presence of pedestrians, vision-only systems do reaaaaallly poorly.
Edward Niedermeyer knows a lot of the researchers and tweets good links to peer-reviewed research articles and study results about this from time to time.