Todd Burch
14-Year Member
Hold the tesla T for 5 seconds after the Easter Egg...
That's been around since the beginning of the Model S. It's how the rangers get into the back end screens. You don't have to do the Easter egg first.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hold the tesla T for 5 seconds after the Easter Egg...
That's to enter service mode. And you can do some neat stuff in there. Chances of any of that being made public - near 0%.Hold the tesla T for 5 seconds after the Easter Egg...
Best to check my arithmetic, but 0 to 60 mph in 2.8 seconds is almost one G, so the filmed portion seems quite a bit less than ludicrous.As I said above, the filmed acceleration does not seem to be significantly different than a ludicrous car.
The pack size matters too. Batteries don't like being drained too fast, and that discharge rate is relative to how big they are. Make a bigger battery, and the same relative discharge rate results in more power.
Best to check my arithmetic, but 0 to 60 mph in 2.8 seconds is almost one G, so the filmed portion seems quite a bit less than ludicrous.
Can you post the speeds at exactly 2,3, and 4 seconds into the acceleration ? I don't know how to see individual frames.
PS. I prefer to see a question mark ('?') after a question. Keyboards still have them.
Acceleration of ONE G is ~ 9.8 meters per second per second, right ?
I wondered about the claim of 1.67 G
It's possible they contrived this figure as the total acceleration felt by the driver, including the 1.0g downward pull from gravity. To get to 1.67g net, you need 1.0g downward + 1.34g horizontal acceleration. (Thank you Pythagoras.) This still stretches the limits of what ordinary road tires are capable of; I thought the traction limit was around 1.1g, but with super-sticky tires it might be possible. Sustained 1.34g forward acceleration would take you from 0-60mph in just a shade over 2 seconds. Wheee!!!
Then again, 1.67g of horizontal acceleration would take you from 0-60mph in about 1.64 seconds. And for reference, top fuel dragsters can go 0-100mph in 0.8 seconds, and 0-60mph in <0.5 seconds. Somehow I don't think this will be street-legal anytime soon
LOL you always have 1G downard. No one would/should be referring to the vector of acceleration and gravity, that would be retarded. And no one said 1.67 continuous. See my post above. As for "street-legal", there's no law that limits torque.
Hence my use of the word "contrived". Even 1.67g instantaneous is not possible with normal road tires; the traction limit is 1.1-1.2g for any commercially available road tires. You'd need your tires to physically melt on the road to provide higher traction that this, and I don't think _that_ would be street-legal
How are you so sure? Because no ICE car has achieved this feat? Or because someone has done the appropriate coefficient of friction calculation? I do have one datapoint, and that is 1.1G's is NOT maxing out traction even with the MXM4's. Of course for rubber, the highest mu is achieved with some amount of longitudinal slip. If Model S's were achieving this small amount of slip through 60, we would all know.. Right now, the torque limits are pre-programmed. It's not like an ICE where the engine does what it can.
The challenge is to hold torque at exactly the right slip ratio, not to light up the tires. This is much more complicated than turning off traction control.Disable traction control in the Model S and you can spin the wheels all you want from 0-20mph. The electric motors have more than enough torque; the limiting factor is friction. If 1.67G's were physically possible with the S's tires, someone would have already done it and smashed the traction-controlled 0-60 times. Since no one has done it, the implication is that the wheels aren't capable of it, because the motors surely are.
Or you could google "tire road friction" and find countless empirical measurements around 1.0 for the maximum tire-road coefficient of friction, which directly corresponds to the maximum horizontal acceleration. (Coefficient of friction 1.0 -> 1.0g max acceleration.) Using very sticky tires, the P90DL has managed ~1.1g for fractions of a second, which is highly impressive. 1.67g is simply not in the realm of possibility for currently used road tire materials.
Single best explanation yet!For what it's worth, I've heard from many individuals that Tesla is very firm about their NDA's. They control the release of information and it's definitely not done through bloggers and VC's, because they are concerned with the messaging that accompanies such a release. Based on my knowledge of how they approach information release, this wasn't a purposeful leak.
If that's true, then either a) this guy is indeed some kind of tester and just completely blasted his NDA, knowing that his friend was going to post a video blog entry about this, or b) he's just got simple ludicrous mode and oversold his rather excitable friend the easter egg in hopes of boosting his followers and ego.
My money's on b).
But, you ruined the funness.At the request of a few people I ruthlessly debunked the video in the comments section. The poster and the P85D owner both replied with nonsense, which I also debunked. Then the reply just turned to basically "Well it's a secret! You'll see!"
30 minutes later the video is no longer available. (Made private)
lol.
Also, based on Kevin Bacon's 6 degrees of separation theorem, couldn't someone who knows someone just call him? Or is this multi-page thread simply more fun?