Many of us communicated with Tesla about our displeasure with the changes, as well as posting on TMC. Point of these boards is to allow for users to interact and share experiences. If Tesla uses these as reference points as well, great. I don't think those of us that have posted concerns here expect this to be the primary way for our voices to be heard.
-
Want to remove ads? Register an account and login to see fewer ads, and become a Supporting Member to remove almost all ads.
Many of us communicated with Tesla about our displeasure with the changes, as well as posting on TMC. Point of these boards is to allow for users to interact and share experiences. If Tesla uses these as reference points as well, great. I don't think those of us that have posted concerns here expect this to be the primary way for our voices to be heard.
dark cloud
Active Member
Well Tesla posts a profit and the V9 post.39 updates essentially come to a standstill. Come on Tesla guys, stop partying and get back to work 
We want .42!
We want .42!
Where "wide" means a handful of cars in North America, followed by a trickle throughout the rest of North America over the next 4 weeks, followed by a handful of cars outside North America and so on...
I interpret wide as 20% of cars per day, reaching 60-80% in one week. Let’s see what happens tomorrow morning.
I hope this release also improves the jitteriness of the 360 degree view and make the direct behind view work.
I hope this release also improves the jitteriness of the 360 degree view and make the direct behind view work.
pjw65
Member
2018.42.2 spotted in US (Model 3), UK and Norway (Model X) - all HW 2.5 as of teslafi.
Looks like the firmware with Nav-on-Autopilot got a pothole. Did they forget to turn off some features?
Just a note here: it would have been easier just to pull up the product specifications for the GPS units in the Tesla. From what I've seen, the AP1 vehicles use u-blox LEA-6R, while the AP2 use u-blox NEO-M8L. According to the product sheets, operating with SBAS, the LEA-6R performs at 2.0m CEP and NEO-M8L performs at 1.5m CEP.
Just using Google Maps, I measured lane width to be 3.85m, or about 1.9m for one half of the lane (to enable comparison with radius of the error circle). Is this really enough to resolve lanes consistently?
f205v
Member
The newer NEO-M8L is capable of receiving Galileo signal, which should have a resolution of about 20cm
Ryshaw
Member
No update here... saw the tweet last night, but alas woke up to the ole girl still being on 2018.39, and no notice for a new update . Let us know how the new feature is. Everything I understand points to driver still needing to initiate lame changes with the stalk.
dark cloud
Active Member
What? why are you so special... yup, here she comes. Nothing for me so far. One car in France with AP1 got it?
BigNick
Infamous Fat Sweaty Guy
Cue the frenzied checking of router traffic monitors.
Bill Price
Active Member
Confirming the update to 42.2
Confirming anything else would be a violation of the EAP program.
Similar threads
