Welcome to Tesla Motors Club
Discuss Tesla's Model S, Model 3, Model X, Model Y, Cybertruck, Roadster and More.
Register

Blog Tesla Announces Supercharger Push in Urban Areas

This site may earn commission on affiliate links.
Tesla announced today a new Supercharger station design that aims to better accommodate owners in urban areas.

According to a Tesla blog post:

Superchargers in urban areas have a new post design that occupies less space and is easier to install, making them ideal for dense, highly populated areas. To increase efficiency and support a high volume of cars, these Superchargers have a new architecture that delivers a rapid 72 kilowatts of dedicated power to each car. This means charging speeds are unaffected by Tesla vehicles plugging into adjacent Superchargers, and results in consistent charging times around 45 to 50 minutes for most drivers.

Tesla says the urban Supercharger stations will be installed in convenient locations like supermarkets, shopping centers and downtown districts “so it’s easy for customers to charge their car in the time it takes to grocery shop or run errands.”

Chicago and Boston will receive the first of the urban Superchargers.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Okay, it appears that my guess was wrong. Current owners on the unlimited free Supercharging plan can use these new chargers for free, as far as we know right now. Interesting.
You've pulled the idea out of thin air. Of course it was wrong. There is absolutely no reason to believe that these "wouldn't count as superchargers". It's one thing to pass on a rumor; it's another to be the person making it up to begin with.
 
  • Like
Reactions: James*
  • Like
Reactions: MP3Mike
So how fast would these chargers charge a Tesla from empty to full. I know many different battery sizes. Just looking for ballpark. The 72kW information is confusing me.

It makes less difference than you might think. The existing chargers start tapering right away, so there's some level of charge at which it makes no difference at all. Cars with bigger batteries taper less quickly, they'll see a bigger effect.

For my 85, I calculate a worst case (come in at 0%) difference of about 8 minutes, i.e the new chargers would take 8 minutes longer to get to a given level. Coming in at 20% would be 4 minutes longer, and at 40% or higher the times are the same.
 
Good question - I bet you're right (AC connect). That would make them easier to install. They'd have to have some kind of cooling built into the pedestal.
Yeah, that's what I was musing about in my earlier post in this thread:

scaesare said:
I wonder if there's any chance the actual chargers themselves live within the pedestals themselves. Assuming they use a stack of the new 72A chargers also used in cars, that would imply needing 4-ish of them. They are slimmer, however they are a "solid" cabinet. The Tesla post implies they aren't shared, and hence don't need a single back-end cabinet. It would also seem to ease installation somewhat. But I don't see any cooling provision..

I wonder if there are cooling vents on the back side we can't see....
 
  • Love
Reactions: Richg
All things being equal, if I need to add 100 mi to my 70D battery, I'm only going to go 3 extra miles out of my way to reach a 120kW Supercharger as opposed to the newer 72kW (metrocharger) Supercharger... and maybe 5 miles out of my way if its on a highway.
 
TMC member @krtrice has posted photos of the new Chicago Supercharger location in this thread 2017 Supercharger Plan: New Chicago city location?

In the closeup photo posted of the front of one of the new chargers there are no cooling vents visible, perhaps there are on the back side. But in one of the photos there is a chain link fence visible on the far left but I can't tell what is behind the fence. I've asked @krtrice if there is Supercharger equipment behind the fence.

Us Tesla geeks want more info. :rolleyes:
 
Tesla's blog post at Supercharging Cities does not clarify as to whether or not current owners with unlimited free Supercharging can use these new charging locations for free or not. As one of those owners, I would be fine with Tesla charging me (and everyone) for use (and idle fees) since that would make these new charging locations more usable and accessible for all Tesla owners. Since Tesla's blog post makes no mention of current unlimited use owners being able to use these new Superchargers for free, my guess is they won't be available for free use.

Okay, it appears that my guess was wrong. Current owners on the unlimited free Supercharging plan can use these new chargers for free, as far as we know right now. Interesting.

You've pulled the idea out of thin air. Of course it was wrong. There is absolutely no reason to believe that these "wouldn't count as superchargers". It's one thing to pass on a rumor; it's another to be the person making it up to begin with.
In both my posts I labeled my thoughts as a "guess". See above, in case you didn't read what I actually wrote. I was not "passing on a rumor". I was speculating and labeling it as such. And you criticize me for making things up "out of thin air". It must be entertaining making things up so you have something to criticize.
 
Doesn't appear to be a way to use the Boston ones without paying the pru's parking fees? Which... really sucks.

I live downtown. I pay to park in a garage across the street from my apt, that does not have charging facilities.

I was really excited to finally get a super charger nearby so I didn't have to drive to dedham or pay the lenox valet fee every time we want to take a trip or we need a top up. But to use these, it seems the minimum parking fee would be $12. I really hope they come up with a parking validation scheme for tesla owners or these are nearly completely useless for urban owners like me/will basically never get used (only in an emergency).

On the technical side, these seem to be "standard" 135kW paired supercharger cabinets, so the only reason these are limited to 72kW is that the new smaller charging pedestals are only rated for 200A:
 

Attachments

  • IMG_9341.JPG
    IMG_9341.JPG
    390.6 KB · Views: 99
  • IMG_9345.JPG
    IMG_9345.JPG
    255.6 KB · Views: 80
  • IMG_9349.JPG
    IMG_9349.JPG
    321.9 KB · Views: 1,385