TMC is an independent, primarily volunteer organization that relies on ad revenue to cover its operating costs. Please consider whitelisting TMC on your ad blocker and becoming a Supporting Member. For more info: Support TMC
  1. TMC is currently READ ONLY.
    Click here for more info.

Tesla Energy and utility scale projects

Discussion in 'TSLA Investor Discussions' started by adiggs, Mar 16, 2017.

Tags:
  1. jhm

    jhm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2014
    Messages:
    9,294
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    I suspect that nearly all the gains apply. One exception is cell vehicle integration. However life cycle gains are a big advantage of stationary over private vehicle applications. So to be somewhat conservative we may want to back out the gains from cell vehicle integration. Thus, the $/MWh is potentially reduced 49% (56% total minus 7% cell vehicle. Perhaps more importantly for production ramp up, the capex per GWh is potentially reduced 61% (69% total minus 8% cell vehicle).

    Now after having backed out cell vehicle integration, we can certainly respect that the MegaPack housing likely represents a substantial reduction in pack costs over the PowerPack. It's possible that the large cells may require less internal supports. The outer housing is driven by the surface area of the pack in ratio to the volume (and hence MWh capacity) of the battery. So the scale of of MegaPack is really important for reducing the amount of housing per MWh. Additionally, installation costs can be driven down by doing more of wiring and integration with inverter in the factory. The MegaPack size is probably optimized for transport and onsite installation.

    The gain in range (from presentation deck) probably speaks to energy density gains (both by weigh and volume). So density speaks to optimizing the capacity of the MegaPack. Maybe this is 40% (54% minus 14% cell vehicle integration.) Density gains likely translate into transport and installation cost efficiencies.
     
    • Like x 1
  2. TheTalkingMule

    TheTalkingMule Distributed Energy Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,308
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    There's gonna be a major switch flipped this year and next when we can get enough new cheaper cells for megapacks utilizing autobidder.

    Just thinking this weekend about the 180MW grid in the USVI and far larger grid in Puerto Rico. They pay $.48 and $.21 per Watt at retail. Imagine the drop-in storage product Tesla could offer to backup moderate sized solar farms, offshore wind, and balance load/frequency. All their blackouts and frequency problems gone, electric bills cut by 1/3.

    Gonna bump my USVI energy thread to brainstorm these solutions and try to put a number on savings.

    A lot of chatter out there of Jigar Shah becoming Energy Secretary. He's the kind of person who would act lightning fast on "shovel ready" energy projects like that..
     
    • Informative x 2
  3. Off Shore

    Off Shore Off Topic Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2015
    Messages:
    993
    Location:
    Isla de Ometepe, Nicaragua
    Pointer please.
     
    • Like x 1
  4. TheTalkingMule

    TheTalkingMule Distributed Energy Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,308
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    • Helpful x 1
  5. EinSV

    EinSV Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2016
    Messages:
    4,318
    Location:
    NorCal
    #625 EinSV, Oct 26, 2020
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2020
    One other thing to factor in is that rapidly falling finance rates for renewables combined with extended battery life should allow for some nice reductions in PPA costs that are not captured in $/MWh battery capacity.

    For example, if the battery life is extended from 15 years to 30 years at an interest rate of 5%, the battery cost savings would be about 32% per kWh energy.

    You can play around with the assumptions, but the bottom line is that added battery life should reduce PPA costs, whether for batteries alone or batteries combined with solar or wind. This will expand the market for batteries and accelerate the sunsetting of gas and coal plants.
     
    • Like x 2
  6. MC3OZ

    MC3OZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2019
    Messages:
    2,018
    Location:
    QLD Australia
    Community battery storage will help "dumb" networks catch up with energy transition | RenewEconomy

    Transmission is $80 per MWh in Australia or 8 cents per kWh.
    The wholesale/retail/transmission split is something like 40%/30%/30%. So retail most be another 8 cents per kWh... So 16 cents per kWh is transmission and retail which behind-the-meter doesn't have to pay.

    Australia is probably an extreme example, this would vary by country, but home battery and solar really exposes the inefficiencies and profit-margins in the existing grid.

    It is likely that in most locations a simple bundled service per kWh will look bad compared to how batteries and solar. When transmission and retail/administration are split out, they will look even worse.

    Utilities and the other power industry companies are suffering from outdated technology, outdated business practices and a business model under threat.
     
    • Like x 2
  7. MC3OZ

    MC3OZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2019
    Messages:
    2,018
    Location:
    QLD Australia
    I was thinking just yesterday that exporting Megapacks from China built with CATL/LG 4680 LFP cells would make a lot of sense.

    Tesla is struggling to meet Megapack demand, LFP seems like an ideal fit. China can satisfy internal demand and export to Europe and the Asia Pacific, this would free up US Megapack production for US demand.
     
    • Like x 2
  8. jhm

    jhm Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2014
    Messages:
    9,294
    Location:
    Atlanta, GA
    This is a good point. Also increasing the duration from 15 to 30 years increases the sensitivity to rate assumption. At 30 years, if you reduce the interest rate from 5% to 4%, this decrease the $/MWh about 11.06%, but at just 15 years it would only reduce the cost by 6.44%.

    The point here is that cost of capital for renewable projects has been coming down relative to fossil projects. Longer duration batteries can ride that advantage better. Also government/fed policies can work to reduce the cost of capital, for example loan guarantees, quantitative easing. So those policies become more potent. I do expect central banks will move to support climate goals. I also suspect that integrating storage with an RE project could reduce financial risk, which would help to keep the cost of capital down.
     
    • Like x 3
  9. TheTalkingMule

    TheTalkingMule Distributed Energy Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,308
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    • Informative x 4
  10. Doggydogworld

    Doggydogworld Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2019
    Messages:
    1,504
    Location:
    Texas
    These articles tend to be somewhat scattershot. The coal retirements (by 2025) are real, part of an ongoing national trend. WEC's 10-Q mentions them and goes on to say:

    ... we expect to invest approximately $2 billion in low-cost renewable energy in Wisconsin. Our plan is to replace a portion of the retired capacity by building and owning a combination of clean, natural gas-fired generation and zero-carbon-emitting renewable generation facilities that are anticipated to include:
    •800 MW of utility-scale solar;
    •600 MW of battery storage;
    •100 MW of wind; and
    •100 MW of reciprocating internal combustion engine (RICE) natural gas-fueled generation.​

    They have approval for 300 MW of solar. The battery and wind are just goals so far. They also mention approval to buy a 200 MW slice of Alliant's NGCC West Riverside Energy Center. So the approved projects should produce:

    NG - 200 MW combined cycle @ 75% duty cycle plus 100 MW piston ICE peakers at 25% duty cycle = ~1500 GWh/year
    Solar - 300 MW utility scale trackers in WI @ 20% net AC duty cycle = ~500 GWh/year

    As usual, solar, wind and battery get the headlines while NG provides the bulk of the kWhs.
     
    • Disagree x 1
  11. ItsNotAboutTheMoney

    ItsNotAboutTheMoney Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2012
    Messages:
    10,212
    Location:
    Maine
    The article is about future plans, not what's already been approved. They are seeking PUC approval for it.

    The 200MW CCGT you mention, plus another 100MW ICE NG, plus some solar covers the current requirements from the 1.1GW coal plant closure, and then the other renewables would cover the remaining 0.7GW of fossil retirements.
     
  12. Christine600

    Christine600 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2018
    Messages:
    1,114
    Location:
    Scandiwegian
    I don't have full read access but perhaps someone here has? I could read the first few lines of text:

    Bloomberg - Are you a robot?

    A Megabattery Boom Is Coming to Rescue Overloaded Power Grids
    The race began at 100 megawatts. Now 300- and 400-megawatt plants are on the way.

    The world’s overloaded power grids are on the cusp of a megabattery boom. California, keen to avoid last year’s blackouts, could add more than 2 gigawatts of energy storage, including from batteries, by summer.

    The frenzied rush to claim the title of “biggest battery” started in 2017, when Tesla Inc. and French renewable energy company Neoen SA installed the first 100-megawatt lithium-ion storage project in Australia.

    As systems get bigger, they can store and dispatch more energy. That’s seen the titleholder changing frequently—leading to Vistra Corp.’s 300MW Moss Landing project in California claiming the current top spot.

    TODAY’S No. 1

    Moss Landing Energy Storage FacilityMonterey County, Calif.Initial capacity: 300MW; 1,200 megawatt-hoursAfter expansion: 400MW; 1,600MWh
     
    • Like x 1
  13. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    Edit, we know, but that blurb does not call out that:
    Moss landing is also using Tesla tech, 256+ Megapacks.
     
    • Like x 3
  14. mspohr

    mspohr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    8,943
    Location:
    California
    Batteries are good but probably better if they were distributed rather than lumped together. Better to respond to local conditions.
     
  15. mongo

    mongo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2017
    Messages:
    12,857
    Location:
    Michigan
    Responsiveness is going to be similar through a local grid. Distribution helps if it puts the storage on the other side of an overloaded substation or other end of an overloaded set of power lines (or islanding during faults). Since this is going in at an existing substation, it will reduce upstream feeder loads during load peaks, so bulk capacity.
     
  16. mspohr

    mspohr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    8,943
    Location:
    California
    Moss landing is a good site. Others may not be.
     
    • Like x 1
  17. TheTalkingMule

    TheTalkingMule Distributed Energy Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2012
    Messages:
    6,308
    Location:
    Philadelphia, PA
    It should be clear to all fans of Tesla and their vision that there's a market for these products at today's prices. We don't need subsidies and a Green New Deal per se, we most urgently need regulation and clear direction from FERC and the DoE.

    Why don't homeowners have a nationwide Energy Bill of Rights yet? If someone puts a solar array on their roof today, their net metering could be taken away tomorrow creating an untenable and absurdly unfair economic situation. We need to be given priority, as was intended, not the grid operator

    Why isn't there a mandatory grid storage formula yet? If every utility were mandated a certain percentage of peak load and daily demand be installed as storage, that creates a much easier landing for new wind/solar projects. Better yet, simply quantify ALL value of a technology like battery storage and force it into the standard utility equation. Gas peaker plants get paid millions every day to balance the load/frequency of grids, a minimum of battery storage removes that cost almost entirely. We need to fully take that into account.

    If the market were reshaped properly, simply on the principles of resilience and efficiency as intended, battery storage would flourish immediately with zero subsidy.
     
    • Like x 3
    • Love x 2
    • Disagree x 1
  18. mspohr

    mspohr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    8,943
    Location:
    California
    Part of the problem is that fossil fuels are su subsidized in many ways. Remove those subsidies.
     
    • Like x 6
    • Disagree x 1
  19. MC3OZ

    MC3OZ Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2019
    Messages:
    2,018
    Location:
    QLD Australia
    #639 MC3OZ, Jan 31, 2021
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2021
    Useful background on what is actually happening to RE generation assets in a mixed gird;-
    Why a whole solar farm went “missing” in Queensland


    Not surprising, but the impact on Wind and Solar generators from economic curtailment, means batteries are the right price are needed ASAP.
     
  20. jboy210

    jboy210 Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2016
    Messages:
    4,603
    Location:
    Northern California
    #640 jboy210, Feb 23, 2021
    Last edited: Feb 23, 2021
    Looks like the project at Moss Landing is moving along well. Looks like all the Megapacks are on-site. Hopefully, that means it will meet its Q2 2021 target.



    PS. Check out the roll of copper wire and the kayakers at the end!
     
    • Informative x 2
    • Like x 1

Share This Page

  • About Us

    Formed in 2006, Tesla Motors Club (TMC) was the first independent online Tesla community. Today it remains the largest and most dynamic community of Tesla enthusiasts. Learn more.
  • Do you value your experience at TMC? Consider becoming a Supporting Member of Tesla Motors Club. As a thank you for your contribution, you'll get nearly no ads in the Community and Groups sections. Additional perks are available depending on the level of contribution. Please visit the Account Upgrades page for more details.


    SUPPORT TMC