In general a good idea when posting articles is to check the timestamp.
Nov. 29, 2020 5:30 am ET
What are the odds that an article posted on WSJ with an important story about Tesla more than 8 hours ago hasn't been posted and discussed all day?
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In general a good idea when posting articles is to check the timestamp.
Nov. 29, 2020 5:30 am ET
What are the odds that an article posted on WSJ with an important story about Tesla more than 8 hours ago hasn't been posted and discussed all day?
You joke, but I still have images of ~1000 unmanned FSD, desert-camo, Minigun-equipped Cybertrucks pushing a Terminator-style assault. I wonder how many pre-orders the DoD has in?Good news. That's going to save me a lot of money! Everyone knows boats are holes in the water you throw money into. On top of that, mercenaries charge considerably more for attacks by sea so this mountain news is a good thing. I just added pre-orders for 400 Cybertrucks. Hopefully I won't need heavy-lift helicopters because I'm planning the worlds first major near-zero carbon land assault since horses and chariots. 400 Cybertrucks is probably excessive but it's hard to tell when @Krugerrand is bluffing.
I don't believe anything ValueAnalyst says, regardless of whether they are ultimately right or wrong.
Has this been posted yet?
The Only Electric Car Stock Worth Buying | The Motley Fool
Some gems:
"Yes, Tesla does more than make cars. And yes, there's a cult following and intense loyalty surrounding the brand. But ultimately, Tesla is much more an automaker than a tech company. It's valued like Google when it should be valued more like Ford."
and
"If you want to invest in electric cars but don't want to be exposed to what looks like a massive bubble, there's still a very good option available: General Motors"
Edit: And the ending "If you want to gamble, buy one of the bubble EV stocks that have gotten so much attention this year. If you want to invest, buy GM stock." I am dying.
Ok, I must have missed a meeting or two, but when did ‘we’ moved from owning islands to mountains???
Yeah that is a real gem of investigative journalism/SHas this been posted yet?
The Only Electric Car Stock Worth Buying | The Motley Fool
Some gems:
"Yes, Tesla does more than make cars. And yes, there's a cult following and intense loyalty surrounding the brand. But ultimately, Tesla is much more an automaker than a tech company. It's valued like Google when it should be valued more like Ford."
and
"If you want to invest in electric cars but don't want to be exposed to what looks like a massive bubble, there's still a very good option available: General Motors"
Edit: And the ending "If you want to gamble, buy one of the bubble EV stocks that have gotten so much attention this year. If you want to invest, buy GM stock." I am dying.
I'm planning the worlds first major near-zero carbon land assault since horses and chariots.
Sure, if that's the reality but we don't know what the reality will be. That roboride might not wait for me. It will be programed to maximize profits.
Had a thought. Is there any precendent for the S&P to ask for opinions on when tranches should be added ?
Is this standard procedure to solicit opinions on when / how tranches should be added, or is this a new invention for TSLA ?
Part of me thinks that leaving the door open to a bit of uncertainty around this is beneficial for those that need to acquire shares, as there will be those that will sit out their acquisitions until a "more concrete" timeline is announced; thereby creating a less steep run up than would otherwise be.
Speaking of Rob, he said in July that, according to multiple sources, even index funds have more flexibility in when they buy TSLA than commonly assumed. So their buying could be spread out also, even if the inclusion dates are not.
This too suggests a sharp pullback after inclusion is unlikely.
(0:46)
Ok, I must have missed a meeting or two, but when did ‘we’ moved from owning islands to mountains???
Certainly. I would expect more negative news/FUD to follow this initial attack. It's becoming more clear to me that the extended period between announcement and inclusion and the different options for inclusion timeline were designed to provide uncertainty, volatility and trading volume through the inclusion process. These things would have a good chance of preventing an "infinity squeeze".
Ok. So if shares go to infinity (or beyond ) I will sell one share.
Some islands (like mine) will be so big, they will have mountains in the middle.Ok, I must have missed a meeting or two, but when did ‘we’ moved from owning islands to mountains???
I wonder if we could just sell a partial share on TDA? Lol! I’d not even consider anything more.Ok. So if shares go to infinity (or beyond ) I will sell one share.
Ok. So if shares go to infinity (or beyond ) I will sell one share.
Good news. That's going to save me a lot of money! Everyone knows boats are holes in the water you throw money into. On top of that, mercenaries charge considerably more for attacks by sea so this mountain news is a good thing. I just added pre-orders for 400 Cybertrucks. Hopefully I won't need heavy-lift helicopters because I'm planning the worlds first major near-zero carbon land assault since horses and chariots. 400 Cybertrucks is probably excessive but it's hard to tell when @Krugerrand is bluffing.