TheTalkingMule
Distributed Energy Enthusiast
Quite a push for $650 this week, impressive! I don't think it will hold.
You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Quite a push for $650 this week, impressive! I don't think it will hold.
There shouldn't be too many investors left looking to divest near-term. I think just about everybody who wanted to do so, got the chance to do so at $695.
2 weeks ago, we went from 580 to 542 in about an hour with SP inclusion not yet happening.So much for the hope that TSLA would be less prone to manipulation once included in the S&P 500. The mandatory morning dip is still with us.
Yeah. I'd say the real threat would be a serious acquisition or just "giving away" their car software and maybe FSD to legacy automakers in return for app sales, advertising whatever.This.
Apple is not a manufacturing company- they are a design company who pays low wages to Chinese manufacturing to build their designs.
That said, they do have like 200 billion dollars in cash sitting around, I guess they could just buy BYD or something for like 1/3rd of their cash on hand if they needed an EV company.
Even then a 100k Model S/Lucid Air type vehicle seems more Apples brand than a Model 3 competitor.... looking at the phone space (or even the PC space before that) they seem perfectly happy to maintain a smaller market share with massive net profit margins.
It being a slow news day so far, there is this matter of "splits have no effect" that I've wanted to address since back when the 5:1 split happened.
There is no argument about how the total value of held shares doesn't change with a split when viewed from a static perspective. However, that last time round I saw no mention of how the dynamic perspective of value growth changes significantly after a split.
Maybe this is so obvious that it goes without saying. If so, my apologies for hammering on this.
To paint the picture better, let's use an example of 100 shares. For each $1 increase in SP, these shares increase in total value by $100.
After a 5:1 split, the previous 100 are now 500 shares, valued each at 1/5 the old SP. Only now, for each $1 increase in SP the shareholders will now net $500.
To me, this always seemed so significant that I didn't understand the abundance of those reporting the split repeatedly touting the aspect of how the split will not affect the value of total shares held, without, in the same breath, remarking upon how the split will significantly affect each shareholders' earnings going forward.
Anywho, just thought I'd run this up the flagpole and see who salutes while we drift in the post-inclusion doldrums.
I had already taken out the money I needed for next year's project. I did put in a couple of GTC sell just in case the stock did go up really high, but not disappointed that I missed out because it will obviously go much higher later on.I do think there’s a category of investors, mainly amateurs, who still want to profit from the meteoric rise the last few months, and this will cause some selling pressure.
Let’s face it: we’ve been outgunned by the pro’s. Most of us only heard about the ‘buy/sell on close’ a couple of days ago, on too short notice to be absolutely certain how to deal with or profit from it.
So much for the hope that TSLA would be less prone to manipulation once included in the S&P 500. The mandatory morning dip is still with us.