I agree it's a smokescreen, the question is, "for what?". Just because the reason emphasized is not valid, does not mean there are not valid reasons. The market is what it is for a reason. Investor sentiment. This market has been ready for a major correction for a LONG time, we just didn't know exactly when it would hit. Now we know but we still don't know how low it will go or how long it will last. It will largely be determined by investor sentiment just as the underlying economy is largely determined by consumer sentiment. These things are impossible to know in advance.
And, as long as one doesn't need to sell in the short-term, and they own quality companies, it doesn't really matter. I would hate to own the companies that are being disrupted right now because their declines will probably not go away.
For what?
tl;dr: My best guess is that the Street has a genuine and legitimate fear of being disintermediated — at least the financial advising and active investment management part. They are putting a bit of stick about to scare retail investors back into line.
At a high level:
Most intelligent investors would have realized years ago that ‘fiduciary responsibility’ is something financial advising firms aim to skirt.
Then, a lot of retail investors got the jump on the street in the 2020 run up. The pandemic gave retail investors the time to look into investing and to build confidence.
It may have also alerted many retail investors to that fact that the financial press is full of it. The press basically says whatever the Street wants them to say. What the Street wants them to say is often not in retail investors’ interest.
For example, look at the coverage in the immediate aftermath of the GME squeeze: According to the press, the problem was “those meddling kids” (shout out to Scooby Doo!
). Precious little mention, if any, of the naked shorting by MM’s, lack of transparency around short action, scandalously negligent SEC oversight of shorts, and the papers’ own complicity.
As regards proximate cause:
The GME squeeze was an act of aggression by retail against the Street. Retail caught the Street in a box canyon, both knew it and retail gunned down a lot of pros. The houses of cards erected by the pros were shown to be fragile to the point of being a threat to larger market.
So:
No wonder Wall Street has gone gunning for Main Street.
Of course there are other subtleties:
For example, the Street may be trying to bully the Fed into extending the supplementary leverage ratio by March 31:
Analysis: Fixed-income markets wary of Fed decision on bank capital relief
“Fears about a rule called the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, come as fixed income markets have become more volatile. Inflation fears helped to send yields on longer-dated Treasuries last week to one-year highs, while flooded money markets briefly sent a key overnight borrowing rate below zero.
On March 31, a regulatory break that big banks have enjoyed regarding SLR is scheduled to expire. Unless the Federal Reserve extends the break, banks will have to hold more capital against Treasury bonds, as well as deposits they keep at the Fed.”
This Powell declined to mention doing yesterday.