L
Linkmeup
Guest
For anyone interested just search for Willian Chandler Delaware Court of Chancery. His decades of practice produced a reputation as pragmatic and consistent with essentially no intervention of personal views. He understands how important impartiality is and how irrelevant personal views should be when dealing with corporate law. He understands that Delaware gained it’s domiciliary success at the expense of New Jersey especially, when New Jersey began to treat corporate issues with a directly political lens.
Whether any other jurisdiction can deal with impartiality is an open question since much of debate today deals with applying partisan views to all walks of life. In my view, Former Chancellor Chandler is, sadly, a member of a threatened species.
Regardless of any views any of us hold on any given TSLA issue, we all should be able to agree that strict adherence to the law should be the ruling principle for judges. Agree we might, but we also no that throughout much of the world, not just the US, that principle is being eviscerated. Moving to Texas does not solve that problem, and may even exacerbate it.
Not to add another potential conspiracy theory to this thread, but ever since the pandemic, I've been inundated with having to join "Community" and partaking in "identifying" myself whenever go to a hobby/interest group. TSLA has a "community" even though it's just a stock in a company at the end of the day. Everything is a community. It was never like this pre-pandemic; there were so fewer communities whether online or offline, but everyone seems to have one now that has people doubling up on many (but with a different organizer).
Here's my theory: The internet platforms (largely social media) makes it so easy to get "involved with a community" via online and spread information (and misinformation) in relatively extremely low-cost ways (online posts). So many are reading and intercepting these posts with direct access to their minds than ever before (especially really important people like the folks that work at Chancery Court in Delaware). As AI data collection has becoming "mainstream" in recent years, it's entirely possible social media companies are leveraging their "communities of users" (and their postings) to enact actions and reactions to support their values and intentions. People are no doubt doing real world actions due to this, its not just funding. You can't escape these platforms anymore because they'll indirectly affect you and bring you into their world view whether you agree with them or not. In most cases, its great! Go speed of information! Go proliferation of information!
...Also, mitigate the the speed of information with slow thought. Also, mitigate the proliferation of information, like a virus, with ways to vaccinate, if its bad information.
I bring this up because of the bolded statement from @unk45 's post.