You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For context - this is kind of like a “Car of the decade” by impact level award by the looks of it. One would think the model 3 is actually the car history will judge as the real meteor strike for the auto industry, with the S being the harbinger mostly ignored until it was too late.
The internal profit from using the Semis for Tesla Inc. is so huge that they really have to go forward with the Semi, and they have to do it as fast as possible. Unlike selling vehicles to the outside, using Semis internally Tesla takes both the manufacturer/dealer profit, *and* the cost savings which normally accrue to the consumer who switches from gas to EV. It will be a huge source of profit, which is needed for expanding battery production. Plus, the marketing value of "eating your own dogfood" is huge.
If the numbers worked leaps or even shares would probably provide better returns.Would consider adding buying a separate car to add to an autonomous fleet service of course if the numbers worked
I really can't wait for this to happen.
If Tesla had a good PR team, this could be huge in terms of good communication, appealing to activists/enviromentalists.
It's one thing to sell a cool "50k$ sedan for SV engineers", another to disrupt and clean the whole transportation system.
And they just need a few dozens out to prove their point.
The fact that Jerome himself is leading this and excited about it makes me all warm and fuzzy.
There will still be that one PETA representative at the Annual Shareholder Meetings complaining about leather on the steering wheel.
Women don’t like EVs???
Both grandmas to my kids have Model 3s.
One grandma has already done a road trip 6k mile round trip, using superchargers and auto pilot. Said it was the best driving experience in her half century plus of driving.
Did I mention highest safety rating really appeals to both men and women consumers?
But I guess USA Today used sources where only men like safety and women just like to live life dangerously “skiing” in M.I.A music videos.
Wall Street thinks we are as dumb as sh*t. His cohort, Mark van der Pluym was in Morocco last week driving an antique car , Mark is a good guy, I hope he wakes up and gets the f out of wall street. It's still stinging (Uber IPO) poor Adam . On the next call, Elon should admit that all Tesla's will be future Terminators come judgment day playcate these these ugly mother fu$kers.Adam Jonas has found a new narrative (took him a week to come up with this one): record Q2 is pull-in from what would have normally been H2 sales:
“We update our TesIa earnings forecast following better than expected 2Q deliveries. At this stage, we have assumed the 2Q beat pulled forward demand from the remainder of the year, leaving our full year delivery forecast unchanged at 347k units. Reiterate EW and $230 PT.”
Adjustments to the model:
Deliveries. Tesla beat our 2Q delivery estimate by 13,622 units. We removed 6,500 units from 3Q and 7,200 units from 4Q. We now expect 3Q deliveries to fall sequentially to 91,300 units before recovering slightly to 97,200 units in 4Q. Model mix and price deterioration take our forecasted Y/Y revenue growth to down 3% for 3Q and down 2% for 4Q.
Gross margin. We left our 2Q19 auto gross margin unchanged at 20.0% (ex regulatory credits) and 21.5% including credits. We forecast 3Q and 4Q auto gross margin on an ex-regulatory credit basis to be 20.6% and 20.9% respectively.
What I don’t understand is how he thinks Tesla is fundamentally overvalued but still has a $230 target for the stock. Isn’t that where we are today?
I went back and listened to the Shareholder meeting again. Some quotes from EM regarding production of the truck and semi:
- "A lot of this is based on our ability to manufacture a lot of cells and make a lot of battery packs."
- "There's not much point in adding product complexity if we don't have enough batteries ... then it's complexity without gain."
"Adding product complexity" in this context means rolling out new models.
So, my question to the group is, "where are we going to get the extra battery capacity?"
The small number of trucks Tesla needs are only a drop in the bucket and won't even move the needle. Nobody cares if we use our own trucks or not. You use what's best for the mission.The internal profit from using the Semis for Tesla Inc. is so huge that they really have to go forward with the Semi, and they have to do it as fast as possible. Unlike selling vehicles to the outside, using Semis internally Tesla takes both the manufacturer/dealer profit, *and* the cost savings which normally accrue to the consumer who switches from gas to EV. It will be a huge source of profit, which is needed for expanding battery production. Plus, the marketing value of "eating your own dogfood" is huge.
I think many R1T buyers will be comfortable charging mostly at home. In fact many are happy Tesla owners like myself.
Shah is currently looking to get a refund for his I-PACE (or at least a replacement unit), and when asked if this experience has discouraged him from EVs as a whole, the car enthusiast stated that his next vehicle will most definitely still be electric. Though this time around, he would make sure that his EV will be a Tesla.
So any penalty tax should be a recurring property tax, not a one time purchase sales tax?We have this in Sweden. The rebates are good but introducing penalty taxes is tricky. It's like the Tesla tax credits ending in US but in reverse. At the end of this year Swedes will linely be buying dirty ICE like crazy because of the penalty tax increasing next year. Morons.
The small number of trucks Tesla needs are only a drop in the bucket and won't even move the needle. Nobody cares if we use our own trucks or not. You use what's best for the mission.
Not true at all. Having worked in multiple companies with this kind of setting - if you don't use your own products, I can tell you the competitors will use that to beat you up in every deal.The small number of trucks Tesla needs are only a drop in the bucket and won't even move the needle. Nobody cares if we use our own trucks or not. You use what's best for the mission.
Bears have been talking about Tesla not using their vehicles as service vehicles for years, and doing the same about the Semi. It definitely matters.Not true at all. Having worked in multiple companies with this kind of setting - if you don't use your own products, I can tell you the competitors will use that to beat you up in every deal.