You can install our site as a web app on your iOS device by utilizing the Add to Home Screen feature in Safari. Please see this thread for more details on this.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
S is a hatchback - or wagon if you will.They may not be demand limited, but a with a wagen they'd not have to offer SR+, just LR AWD and it would sell like made, add really good demand and displace cheaper cars.
Based on the demonstration, I'd think there would be almost no chance of this happening to a very young child. An older child chasing a ball or something would be more likely (although training the system to recognize this should be not all that hard). My main concern in this area is deer and other animals. Deer especially like to leap in front of cars and I'm concerned that the cameras won't see them in time to avoid their random jumps. (Which is why I really want thermal sensors so that if deer are recognized anywhere within about 100 metres the car slows down so it can stop almost instantly.)There _might_ be some kind of public outcry when an autonomous car crashes into a young child and the young child dies, but I suspect that clear video evidence of an unattended child giving the vehicle little-to-no time to react would rapidly redirect public anger at the parent.
Just eliminated drunk/drugged/sleepy driving will make FSD twice as safe. Really FSD just needs to be as good as an average person and it will be way safer.At the risk of sounding insensitive, FSD needs to accomplish two things:
1. Ensure that the risk of harm to a human either inside the FSD Tesla or outside it is 2-3x lower than a human driver.
2. Ensure that any remaining collisions that occur are NOT the fault of the FSD computer. (If someone runs a red light, hits the FSD Tesla, it's not the FSD computer's fault. In time, the likelihood of the FSD computer preventing such a collision despite it not being at fault will increase, which will improve task #1 of reducing the likelihood of injury.)
There are a ton of edge cases, for sure, say people deciding to lay down in the middle of the street (I've seen it before), people falling out of vehicles, etc. Most of these are general obstacle avoidance. Other edge cases involve road construction or damage. I think level 4 plus remote "instruction" to the cars will be quite possible within the next year to two years.
For that matter Rivian's vehicles will be niche products too. The "well off Dentist that likes to go kayaking with his family on the weekend" crowd.Tesla truck will be a niche product. Elon said this many times. It is going to be extremely large, weird/cool, and probably very expensive
BMW has offered 3 series wagons in the US for years....nobody buys them.S is a hatchback - or wagon if you will.
If you want a bigger wagon, which we call SUV, its coming next year.
Either way, there isn't enough demand for LR "wagon" in EU than demand for SR+ in US & China (and EU). Not even close.
Musk should tell Wall St - he will only raise capital when the SP is above $400. They will make it happenI’m really hoping they look at the capital raise idea floated here by @neroden. A great way to reward investors and, especially with short interest where it is, crush shorts.
What is this latest insanity from CNBC? Tesla cars are “quite old”?!
Tesla cars are now 'quite old' and the exclusive brand is at risk, analyst says
Based on the demonstration, I'd think there would be almost no chance of this happening to a very young child. An older child chasing a ball or something would be more likely (although training the system to recognize this should be not all that hard). My main concern in this area is deer and other animals. Deer especially like to leap in front of cars and I'm concerned that the cameras won't see them in time to avoid their random jumps. (Which is why I really want thermal sensors so that if deer are recognized anywhere within about 100 metres the car slows down so it can stop almost instantly.)
When a consumer apply for a loan to buy a Tesla, the bank pays tesla in cash up front.Can someone help me understand the cash-flow from every marginal vehicle sold?
I get that if customers buy a car with cash, Tesla gets the entire fee upfront, but how about with loans?
If I take out a loan through the Tesla website, how much cash does Tesla receive and when?
I see there's a $7500 down payment on model 3 vehicles, so I assume they get that entire sum upon delivery.
How about the remainder? Is Tesla on the hook if someone fails to make a car payment?
Or does Tesla trade that risk right away to some financial institution in exchange for upfront cash?
I heard exactly that:Lack of ownership.
You don't go from 'maybe profit' to $700M loss in a month or two without: raising hand, acknowledging that you screwed up, why you screwed up, and what are you going to do to not screw up again.
If you think you heard that, we live in different worlds. What I heard was spin and excuses, and excuses don't matter at their level. Explanation is useful, but explanation is not an excuse.
I've laid out elsewhere (autonomy day thread IIRC) why this is not sufficient for public acceptance of driverless carsJust eliminated drunk/drugged/sleepy driving will make FSD twice as safe. Really FSD just needs to be as good as an average person
Tesla truck will be a niche product. Elon said this many times. It is going to be extremely large, weird/cool, and probably very expensive
Restoring baseline demand for the S/X is important, at least for now. At 25,000 per quarter, that is probably about 500 million in FCF. I think the S & X should continue to be a solid 1 to 2 billion revenue source. Perhaps they'll build an SUV on the pickup platform at some point and either redo the X, or build an SUV like the Mercedes G class. I don't think that would eat into the X much, but would be a big money maker. 25,000 G type SUV would be a bracket buster.I couldn't possibly care less about S/X demand, it's all about the main product to me. Today that's the M3 and demand still appears to be far stronger than their ability to deliver. Pump em out. Once the Y comes out, I will rejoice in M3 demand falling off a cliff as the newest product takes over the world.
To me, that should be Tesla's role in the automotive world. Pushing marketplace evolution, not looking to incrementally dominate every category. From an investment standpoint, we will truly begin to profit once Tesla is the largest energy company in the US. There's no real money in just making cars.
I think he went all in on J21 LEAPs a few weeks ago. Probably a good idea to just avoid looking at those for now.Then you’ll miss opportunities to buy in even lower like today.
My eternal complaint with Tesla is refusing to offer a wagon S or 3. They may not be demand limited, but a with a wagen they'd not have to offer SR+, just LR AWD and it would sell like made, add really good demand and displace cheaper cars.
What's your TLDR version? If you cut the number of traffic deaths from 37k a year to 15k a year that's not enough? I know people are generally not very bright and will treat FSD deaths differently, but 50% is a huge drop.I've laid out elsewhere (autonomy day thread IIRC) why this is not sufficient for public acceptance of driverless cars
Same with Chicago, which was showing 14 yesterday and 11 this morning. Hmmm. S and X are still at where they were earlier. Something's going on there and it seems unlikely that they suddenly sold all of those this morning.Interesting, NOVA not showing any M3 inventory with 200 miles search